Showing 1 - 20 results of 22,690 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significant deviation effect ))', query time: 0.27s Refine Results
  1. 1

    Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)). by Mobina Faqani (22783963)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
  2. 2

    Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease). by Mobina Faqani (22783963)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14

    General linear mixed model coefficients and significance for species-specific ungulate intensity of use as a function of cattle grazing period. by Kathryn Knodel (20036529)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>Summary table of general linear mixed model describing the weekly intensity of use for each native ungulate species (where elk is the reference category and WT deer is white-tailed deer) and grazing period (where ‘before’ cattle grazing is the reference category), parameter estimates, their standard error (SE) and significance are given. Camera location was included as a random effect (variance = 0.488 and standard deviation = 0.699), the model had strong support (wi = 0.95) and fit the data well (AIC = 693.790, logLik = -330.890, Conditional R<sup>2</sup> = 0.40, and Marginal R<sup>2</sup> = 0.86).…”
  15. 15
  16. 16

    Decreased clonogenic capacity of U87MG and U251MG glioma cells dependent on SHG-44 concentration. by Denis Mustafov (19137870)

    Published 2025
    “…<p><b>(A)</b> A significant decrease in the proliferative clonal capacity of U87MG colonies was observed with 70ΜM and 100ΜM SHG-44 treatment. …”
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20