Search alternatives:
significant difference » significant differences (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
Showing 1 - 20 results of 144,439 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significant difference (decrease OR increase) ))', query time: 0.29s Refine Results
  1. 1

    Encapsulation efficiency significantly decreases with increasing starting bacterial concentration. by Kelly C. Freudenberger Catanzaro (6701789)

    Published 2022
    “…Encapsulation efficiency decreased with increasing starting bacterial concentrations. …”
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

    Increased connectivity in the red lines and decreased connectivity in the blue lines. by Tomoki Kaneko (9113490)

    Published 2023
    “…There is no significant increase/decrease in each seed.</p>…”
  5. 5
  6. 6

    Perioperative factors associated with differences in adjusted hospitalization costs; all displayed factors are significantly associated with increased or decreased adjusted costs. by Saad Mallick (17283479)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>Perioperative factors associated with differences in adjusted hospitalization costs; all displayed factors are significantly associated with increased or decreased adjusted costs.…”
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

    Traits at cellular, leaf, and whole-plant scales which were significantly different [increased (↑) or decreased (↓)] or non-significant between tolerant and sensitive cultivars in the N-deficient treatment. by Ranjeeta Adhikari (9905958)

    Published 2023
    “…<p>Traits at cellular, leaf, and whole-plant scales which were significantly different [increased (↑) or decreased (↓)] or non-significant between tolerant and sensitive cultivars in the N-deficient treatment.…”
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19

    Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice. by Udaysankar Chockanathan (18510288)

    Published 2024
    “…(B) In dCA1, spatial information was decreased in APP/PS1 mice relative to C57BL/6 controls (mean ± std: C57BL/6 = 0.132 ± 0.048, APP/PS1 = 0.128 ± 0.051, p < 0.005, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>C57BL/6</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>APP/PS1</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions). …”
  20. 20