Showing 1 - 20 results of 75,332 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significant effect a ))', query time: 0.77s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

    Data Sheet 1_Elevated relative humidity significantly decreases cannabinoid concentrations while delaying flowering development in Cannabis sativa L..docx by Ingrid Carolina Corredor-Perilla (22631510)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, high RH significantly suppressed cannabinoid accumulation: cannabidiolic acid (CBD-A), cannabidiol (CBD), and cannabichromenic acid (CBC-A) levels decreased by approximately 4.9-fold, 3.2-fold, and 13-fold, respectively. …”
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

    Analysis of Significantly Different Bacteria. by Xu Jia (187142)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>(A, B) Heatmap and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of significantly different bacteria abundances at various taxonomic levels in all samples: phylum (top), genera (middle), and species (bottom). …”
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11

    Inotodiol decreases clone formation in HCC cells. by Yushuang Xing (20636685)

    Published 2025
    “…In addition, inotodiol showed to induce apoptosis, characterized by an increase in Bax expression, a decrease in Bcl-2, Bcl-XL and MCL1 expression, the initiation of cleaved PARP1 and cleaved caspase 3, and inhibition of the MAPK/ERK pathway. …”
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18

    Table 1_Effect of decreased suspended sediment content on chlorophyll-a in Dongting Lake, China.docx by Le Zhang (88249)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Global damming of rivers strongly impacts the transport and characteristic of sediment, resulting in a significant reduction in the suspended sediment content (SSC) flowing into the downstream. …”
  19. 19
  20. 20

    General linear mixed model coefficients and significance for species-specific ungulate intensity of use as a function of cattle grazing period. by Kathryn Knodel (20036529)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>Summary table of general linear mixed model describing the weekly intensity of use for each native ungulate species (where elk is the reference category and WT deer is white-tailed deer) and grazing period (where ‘before’ cattle grazing is the reference category), parameter estimates, their standard error (SE) and significance are given. Camera location was included as a random effect (variance = 0.488 and standard deviation = 0.699), the model had strong support (wi = 0.95) and fit the data well (AIC = 693.790, logLik = -330.890, Conditional R<sup>2</sup> = 0.40, and Marginal R<sup>2</sup> = 0.86).…”