Search alternatives:
significant enrichment » significantly enriched (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
enrichment decrease » enrichment decreases (Expand Search)
significant enrichment » significantly enriched (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
enrichment decrease » enrichment decreases (Expand Search)
-
261
Critical pore size values of each coal sample.
Published 2025“…It shows that the role of peak cluster landform conditions on coal pore structure is significant, and the extent of the role decreases with the increase of vertical principal stresses. …”
-
262
Determination of critical aperture.
Published 2025“…It shows that the role of peak cluster landform conditions on coal pore structure is significant, and the extent of the role decreases with the increase of vertical principal stresses. …”
-
263
Sampling points and mountain elevation.
Published 2025“…It shows that the role of peak cluster landform conditions on coal pore structure is significant, and the extent of the role decreases with the increase of vertical principal stresses. …”
-
264
Pressurized mercury curve.
Published 2025“…It shows that the role of peak cluster landform conditions on coal pore structure is significant, and the extent of the role decreases with the increase of vertical principal stresses. …”
-
265
Pore size distribution of coal samples.
Published 2025“…It shows that the role of peak cluster landform conditions on coal pore structure is significant, and the extent of the role decreases with the increase of vertical principal stresses. …”
-
266
Pore size distribution by MIP.
Published 2025“…It shows that the role of peak cluster landform conditions on coal pore structure is significant, and the extent of the role decreases with the increase of vertical principal stresses. …”
-
267
-
268
-
269
-
270
MGPC module.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
271
Comparative experiment.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
272
Pruning experiment.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
273
Parameter setting table.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
274
DTADH module.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
275
Ablation experiment.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
276
Multi scale detection.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
277
MFDPN module.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
278
Detection effect of different sizes.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
279
Radar chart comparing indicators.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
280
MFD-YOLO structure.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”