Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant factor » significant factors (Expand Search)
factor decrease » factors increases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant factor » significant factors (Expand Search)
factor decrease » factors increases (Expand Search)
-
1941
-
1942
-
1943
Growth assessment parameters before and after biological treatment in the different studies.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1944
Projections of Gastric Cancer Incidence and Mortality Burden in Taiwan Through 2036.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1945
-
1946
-
1947
-
1948
Table2_Significant nocturnal wakefulness after sleep onset in metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease.DOCX
Published 2024“…HC 45.4 min vs. 21.3 min, p = 0.0004), and decreased sleep efficiency (MASLD vs. HC 86.5% vs. 92.8%, p = 0.0008) compared with HC despite comparable sleep duration. …”
-
1949
Table1_Significant nocturnal wakefulness after sleep onset in metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease.DOCX
Published 2024“…HC 45.4 min vs. 21.3 min, p = 0.0004), and decreased sleep efficiency (MASLD vs. HC 86.5% vs. 92.8%, p = 0.0008) compared with HC despite comparable sleep duration. …”
-
1950
-
1951
Additional file 3 of Single-cell profiling reveals a reduced epithelial defense system, decreased immune responses and the immune regulatory roles of different fibroblast subpopula...
Published 2025“…P values were calculated via the two-sided Wilcoxon test. ns, not significant, **, P < 0.01 and ****, P < 0.0001. (G) Feature plot showing LDLR expression levels in C1Q+ macrophages between CAG and control samples.…”
-
1952
-
1953
-
1954
Data Sheet 1_Secretoneurin plasma levels are decreased after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation—patients with AF produce lower SN levels than healthy individuals: the SAFE r...
Published 2025“…Plasma SN levels were significantly lower after the catheter ablation as compared with SN levels before (34.0 ± 15.1 and 40.0 ± 17.3 pmol/L, p = 0.032). …”
-
1955
Representative experimental samples.
Published 2025“…When the humidity decreased from 100% RH to 80% RH, the average EWC dropped from 15.88% to 7.53%. …”
-
1956
Mechanical testing apparatus and samples.
Published 2025“…When the humidity decreased from 100% RH to 80% RH, the average EWC dropped from 15.88% to 7.53%. …”
-
1957
Relationship between UCS, E, and water content.
Published 2025“…When the humidity decreased from 100% RH to 80% RH, the average EWC dropped from 15.88% to 7.53%. …”
-
1958
Hygroscopic experimental device.
Published 2025“…When the humidity decreased from 100% RH to 80% RH, the average EWC dropped from 15.88% to 7.53%. …”
-
1959
-
1960