Descriptive statistics for categorical variables. by Junhui Zhao (626062)

Subjects:

List of triathlon events analyzed. by Junhui Zhao (626062)

Subjects:

Association between dietary niacin intake and COPD odds ratio. by Yushan Shi (16440272)

Subjects:

Quantile regression results of female triathletes. by Junhui Zhao (626062)

Subjects:

Descriptive statistics for numerical variables. by Junhui Zhao (626062)

Subjects:

Videofluoroscopic swallowing study parameters. by Rie Asayama (693361)

Subjects:

Flow diagram of study participants. by Yushan Shi (16440272)

Subjects:

Interventions for Psychological Stress in Pregnant African American Women: A Scoping Review by Taleah A. Frazier (22423294)

Subjects:

Setting up for VFSS image. by Rie Asayama (693361)

Subjects:

Picosecond Lifetimes of Hydrogen Bonds in the Halide Perovskite CH₃NH₃PbBr₃ by Alejandro Garrote-Márquez (16796896)

Subjects:

Interaction panel of Treat × Period effect (T × P) for body measurements as influenced by feeding pasteurized waste milk (WM) or milk replacer (MR) to newborn Holstein calves (n =... by Shahryar Kargar (18880600)

Interaction panel of Treat × Period effect (T × P) for ether extract intake (g/d) as influenced by feeding pasteurized waste milk (WM) or milk replacer (MR) to newborn Holstein cal... by Shahryar Kargar (18880600)

Improved Accuracy and Reliability in Untargeted Analysis with LC-ESI-QTOF/MS¹ by Ensemble Averaging by Guillaume Laurent Erny (21000926)

Subjects:

Improved Accuracy and Reliability in Untargeted Analysis with LC-ESI-QTOF/MS¹ by Ensemble Averaging by Guillaume Laurent Erny (21000926)

Subjects:

Interaction panel of Treat × Period effect (T × P) for starter intake (g/d), body weight (kg), average daily gain (g/d), and feed efficiency (g/g) as influenced by feeding pasteuri... by Shahryar Kargar (18880600)

Interaction panel of Treat × Period effect (T × P) for eating time (min/8-h) and sorting index (%) on sieve 2.36 mm and bottom pan as influenced by feeding pasteurized waste milk (... by Shahryar Kargar (18880600)

Major hyperparameters of RF-SVR. by Jintao Li (448681)

“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R² value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”

Pseudo code for coupling model execution process. by Jintao Li (448681)

“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R² value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”

Major hyperparameters of RF-MLPR. by Jintao Li (448681)

“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R² value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”

Results of RF algorithm screening factors. by Jintao Li (448681)

“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R² value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”