Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant i » significant _ (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant 17 (Expand Search)
i decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant i » significant _ (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant 17 (Expand Search)
i decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
-
341
-
342
List of Included studies.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
343
The search strategy in three databases.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
344
A summary of the included study characteristics.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
345
NIH score.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
346
List of excluded studies.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
347
Parvalbumin-positive interneurons (PV-INs) in perilesional tissue respond to optogenetic stimulation and are involved in voluntary movement, but show a decreased firing rate.
Published 2025“…<b>E</b>, Quantification of the average firing rate of the recorded PV-INs in response to optogenetic stimulation. A significant decrease in firing activity is evident in stroke animals (Two-tailed <i>T</i> Test *** <i><i>P</i></i> < 0.001). …”
-
348
-
349
-
350
-
351
Table 2_The impact of decreased prognostic nutritional index on the prognosis of patients with pneumonia treated with glucocorticoids: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.docx
Published 2025“…Multivariable Cox regression showed that, after full adjustment for potential confounders, every 2-unit decrease in PNI was associated with a 10% higher 30-day mortality hazard (HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.05–1.15, p < 0.001) and a 9% higher 90-day mortality hazard (HR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04–1.14, p < 0.001). …”
-
352
Table 3_The impact of decreased prognostic nutritional index on the prognosis of patients with pneumonia treated with glucocorticoids: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.docx
Published 2025“…Multivariable Cox regression showed that, after full adjustment for potential confounders, every 2-unit decrease in PNI was associated with a 10% higher 30-day mortality hazard (HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.05–1.15, p < 0.001) and a 9% higher 90-day mortality hazard (HR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04–1.14, p < 0.001). …”
-
353
Table 5_The impact of decreased prognostic nutritional index on the prognosis of patients with pneumonia treated with glucocorticoids: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.docx
Published 2025“…Multivariable Cox regression showed that, after full adjustment for potential confounders, every 2-unit decrease in PNI was associated with a 10% higher 30-day mortality hazard (HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.05–1.15, p < 0.001) and a 9% higher 90-day mortality hazard (HR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04–1.14, p < 0.001). …”
-
354
Table 4_The impact of decreased prognostic nutritional index on the prognosis of patients with pneumonia treated with glucocorticoids: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.docx
Published 2025“…Multivariable Cox regression showed that, after full adjustment for potential confounders, every 2-unit decrease in PNI was associated with a 10% higher 30-day mortality hazard (HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.05–1.15, p < 0.001) and a 9% higher 90-day mortality hazard (HR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04–1.14, p < 0.001). …”
-
355
-
356
-
357
-
358
-
359
-
360