Showing 1,801 - 1,820 results of 15,659 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significant i decrease ))~', query time: 0.31s Refine Results
  1. 1801
  2. 1802
  3. 1803
  4. 1804
  5. 1805

    RNA targets of Mod identified by RiP-Seq. by Amalia S. Parra (4173004)

    Published 2024
    “…Mod is expressed in larval brains and its loss leads to a significant decrease in the number of central brain NBs. …”
  6. 1806
  7. 1807
  8. 1808
  9. 1809

    Busulfan treatment induces orchitis. by Lingjun Zhao (21763122)

    Published 2025
    “…(C) interleukin (IL)-6, and (D) IL-1β; the concentrations for all factors significantly increase over time.…”
  10. 1810
  11. 1811
  12. 1812
  13. 1813
  14. 1814
  15. 1815
  16. 1816

    269 miRNAs of the 8 DSERGs. by Wei He (131453)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>Cellular SRGs, such as CHEK1, CENPA, FOXM1, BRCA1, AURKA, MAD2L1,PTTG1 and EZH2 might hold significance in AAD, among which CHEK1, FOXM1, BRCA1 could potentially serve as molecular biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of AAD. …”
  17. 1817

    Comprehensive list of all SRGs. by Wei He (131453)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>Cellular SRGs, such as CHEK1, CENPA, FOXM1, BRCA1, AURKA, MAD2L1,PTTG1 and EZH2 might hold significance in AAD, among which CHEK1, FOXM1, BRCA1 could potentially serve as molecular biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of AAD. …”
  18. 1818

    A total of 700 DEGs. by Wei He (131453)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>Cellular SRGs, such as CHEK1, CENPA, FOXM1, BRCA1, AURKA, MAD2L1,PTTG1 and EZH2 might hold significance in AAD, among which CHEK1, FOXM1, BRCA1 could potentially serve as molecular biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of AAD. …”
  19. 1819
  20. 1820

    Advancing Circular Bioeconomy through a Systems-Level Assessment of Food Waste and Industrial Sludge Codigestion by Md. Nizam Uddin (21632518)

    Published 2025
    “…The sustainability analysis revealed that the codigestion of FW-PPMS had median costs of 236.64 USD·tonne<sup>–1</sup>·day<sup>–1</sup> and emissions of 228.30 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq·tonne<sup>–1</sup>·day<sup>–1</sup>, a significant reduction compared to directly disposing the FW in landfills (median costs of 405.13 USD·tonne<sup>–1</sup>·day<sup>–1</sup> and emissions of 556.27 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq·tonne<sup>–1</sup>·day<sup>–1</sup>). …”