Showing 821 - 840 results of 4,412 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significant impact decrease ))~', query time: 0.26s Refine Results
  1. 821
  2. 822

    Fig 2 - by Masoud Rahmati (16665456)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
  3. 823
  4. 824
  5. 825
  6. 826
  7. 827
  8. 828
  9. 829
  10. 830
  11. 831

    Fig 6 - by Teagan McMahon (20108036)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
  12. 832
  13. 833
  14. 834
  15. 835
  16. 836
  17. 837
  18. 838

    Experiment setting. by Chengmin Zhou (14554562)

    Published 2025
    “…However, the advantages of the AR display will weaken as the complexity of the scenarios decreases. Additionally, the Surround Recognition (SR) display is more likely to reduce drivers’ SA (the fixation counts on the SR display was significantly higher than that on the P3D and AR displays; P < 0.001) and take-over efficiency (the take-over reaction time for the SR display was significantly longer than that for the AR display; P = 0.09), especially in medium-complexity scenarios. …”
  19. 839

    Experimental flow. by Chengmin Zhou (14554562)

    Published 2025
    “…However, the advantages of the AR display will weaken as the complexity of the scenarios decreases. Additionally, the Surround Recognition (SR) display is more likely to reduce drivers’ SA (the fixation counts on the SR display was significantly higher than that on the P3D and AR displays; P < 0.001) and take-over efficiency (the take-over reaction time for the SR display was significantly longer than that for the AR display; P = 0.09), especially in medium-complexity scenarios. …”
  20. 840

    Example of Group C scene material. by Chengmin Zhou (14554562)

    Published 2025
    “…However, the advantages of the AR display will weaken as the complexity of the scenarios decreases. Additionally, the Surround Recognition (SR) display is more likely to reduce drivers’ SA (the fixation counts on the SR display was significantly higher than that on the P3D and AR displays; P < 0.001) and take-over efficiency (the take-over reaction time for the SR display was significantly longer than that for the AR display; P = 0.09), especially in medium-complexity scenarios. …”