Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
insights decrease » slight decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
insights decrease » slight decrease (Expand Search)
-
781
-
782
Spatial transcriptomics analysis of NFKB2, HSD11B1, and GR in KIRC tissues.
Published 2025Subjects: -
783
-
784
-
785
The difference of drug sensitivity between high and low-GSRS subjects in the TCGA-KIRC cohort.
Published 2025Subjects: -
786
-
787
-
788
-
789
-
790
-
791
-
792
-
793
-
794
-
795
-
796
-
797
-
798
-
799
-
800
Comparison with Existing Studies.
Published 2025“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”