Search alternatives:
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
interaction decrease » intervention decreases (Expand Search), interaction terms (Expand Search), interaction dataset (Expand Search)
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
interaction decrease » intervention decreases (Expand Search), interaction terms (Expand Search), interaction dataset (Expand Search)
-
1141
-
1142
Data Sheet 1_Sulfur compounds navigate redox processes, leukotriene synthesis, and ω-hydroxylation of leukotriene B4 in neutrophil interaction with the bacteria Salmonella typhimur...
Published 2025“…NaSH significantly suppressed the reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation in neutrophils. …”
-
1143
The dataset for Aerosol emission reductions cause post-2011 rapid warming in the northwestern Pacific.
Published 2025“…Aerosol-driven ocean warming manifests a five-year lag post-emission reductions, governed by threshold-triggered nonlinear aerosol-cloud interaction where cloud decrease occurs only below critical aerosol thresholds (AOD = 0.2). …”
-
1144
OMT
Published 2024“…<p dir="ltr">In this study, we performed a series of experiments to investigate the effects of oxymatrine (OMT) on hemangioma cells and its mechanisms. OMT was found to significantly increase the apoptosis rate of endothelial cells (ECs) treated with oxidised low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL), as measured by caspase-3 activity assay and flow cytometry. qRT-PCR results showed that OMT treatment decreased the expression of miR-199a-5p in ECs.Transfection of miR-199a-5p mimics enhanced the apoptotic effect, whereas miR-199a-5p inhibitors attenuated apoptosis, suggesting that miR-199a-5p has a key regulatory role in EC apoptosis. …”
-
1145
-
1146
-
1147
-
1148
Scatterplot 8.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
1149
Scatterplot 5.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
1150
Scatterplot 9.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
1151
Scatterplot 1.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
1152
Scatterplot 6.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
1153
Scatterplot 2.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
1154
Raw data of this study.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
1155
Scatterplot 4.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
1156
Scatterplot 3.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
1157
Correlation matrix.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
1158
Scatterplot 7.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
1159
Baseline characteristics of the four groups.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
1160
Flow of included patients through the trial.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”