Search alternatives:
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
interaction terms » interaction tests (Expand Search), interaction patterns (Expand Search), interaction networks (Expand Search)
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
interaction terms » interaction tests (Expand Search), interaction patterns (Expand Search), interaction networks (Expand Search)
-
381
Supplementary file 1_Intercropping of short- and tall-stature maize decreases lodging risk without yield penalty at high planting density.docx
Published 2025“…Compared with IND, IHD did not significantly improve the population yield. The upper leaf area of intercropped XY was greater than sole stand, leading to increased interception of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). …”
-
382
-
383
-
384
<b>Manure improves temperature sensitivity of soil organic carbon by increasing soil alphaproteobacteria, phenols, and pH and decreasing soil esters</b>
Published 2024“…The results revealed that the Q<sub>10</sub> under M and NPKM were 1.59 and 1.66, respectively, which were significantly higher than those under CK (1.35), N (1.29), and NPK (1.36). …”
-
385
-
386
Supporting information_raw dataset.
Published 2025“…The interactions among tillage, residue, and N were significant for most P pools highlighting the synergistic effects of CA and N management. …”
-
387
Soil phosphorus fractionations procedure [41].
Published 2025“…The interactions among tillage, residue, and N were significant for most P pools highlighting the synergistic effects of CA and N management. …”
-
388
-
389
-
390
-
391
-
392
Summary of significance levels for comparison of surgical segment ROM between different test groups.
Published 2025Subjects: -
393
-
394
Analysis of the Nugent score before (T=0) and after (T=1) the use of the vaginal gel. Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).
Published 2025“…Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).…”
-
395
Descriptive statistics of alcohol consumption in G7 countries (in litres/capita).
Published 2024Subjects: -
396
-
397
-
398
-
399
-
400