Search alternatives:
significant intervention » significant interaction (Expand Search), significant interactions (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
intervention decreases » interventions increased (Expand Search), intervention areas (Expand Search), intervention phases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant intervention » significant interaction (Expand Search), significant interactions (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
intervention decreases » interventions increased (Expand Search), intervention areas (Expand Search), intervention phases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Analysis of the Nugent score before (T=0) and after (T=1) the use of the vaginal gel. Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).
Published 2025“…Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).…”
-
9
-
10
Table_1_FMT intervention decreases urine 5-HIAA levels: a randomized double-blind controlled study.DOCX
Published 2024“…However, in the placebo group, GSRS, CARS, and SRS scores showed no significant changes, while ABC scores decreased from 72 to 58.75 (p = 0.034). …”
-
11
-
12
The table shows the significant and non-significant altered group with different parameters.
Published 2025Subjects: -
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Decreased virulence observed during <i>in planta</i> infection with <i>ΔFgknr4</i>.
Published 2025“…</b> Number of diseased spikelets per wheat spike at 15 dpi (N = 10). Letters indicate significant differences (ANOVA, TukeyHSD <i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
18
-
19
-
20