Showing 461 - 480 results of 2,820 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significant non decrease ))~', query time: 0.41s Refine Results
  1. 461
  2. 462
  3. 463
  4. 464
  5. 465
  6. 466

    Flow chart of data screening and analysis. by Yan She (8639796)

    Published 2025
    “…In contrast, the BMD, BV/TV, and Tb.N in the 12-week model group exhibited a modest but non-significant decrease relative to the 9-week model group. …”
  7. 467
  8. 468

    S1 Data - by Du Siqi (20721422)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared to the short-time Fourier transform (STFT) and the dispersion-dissipation transform (DDT), the modified Warping transform (MWT) achieves a clearer separation of the modes of the target received signal under the variable sound speed profile of the non-ideal waveguide. The depth estimation method proposed in this study effectively resolves the issues of passive source depth estimation under variable sound speed profiles, which typically result in a significant decrease in estimation accuracy. …”
  9. 469

    S1 File - by Du Siqi (20721422)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared to the short-time Fourier transform (STFT) and the dispersion-dissipation transform (DDT), the modified Warping transform (MWT) achieves a clearer separation of the modes of the target received signal under the variable sound speed profile of the non-ideal waveguide. The depth estimation method proposed in this study effectively resolves the issues of passive source depth estimation under variable sound speed profiles, which typically result in a significant decrease in estimation accuracy. …”
  10. 470

    <i>Aedes aegypti</i> database from SAGO traps. by Jesús A. Aguilar-Durán (9931967)

    Published 2025
    “…IVM treatment reduced the number of females per trap per week from 3.29 ± 0.24 to 2.41 ± 0.20 (33.7% reduction), AGO from 1.58 ± 0.17 to 0.25 ± 0.05 (85.2% reduction), and AGO + IVM from 1.49 ± 0.17 to 0.53 ± 0.08 (67.78% reduction), based on Henderson’s formula. We observed a non-significant increase in the control area (no treatment provided) in the mosquito populations, increasing from 2.94 ± 0.24 in the pretreatment period to 3.25 ± 0.28 of the post treatment period.…”
  11. 471
  12. 472
  13. 473
  14. 474
  15. 475
  16. 476
  17. 477
  18. 478
  19. 479
  20. 480