Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant non » significant gap (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant non » significant gap (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
-
41
-
42
-
43
Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
44
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
45
-
46
-
47
Enrichment Analysis Based on Ferroptosis-Related Differentially Expressed Genes.
Published 2025Subjects: -
48
-
49
-
50
-
51
-
52
-
53
-
54
-
55
Annual treatment frequencies in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…<p>In the recurrence group, the respective treatment counts for anti-VEGF, STTA, MA-PC, PPV, and total treatments (mean ± standard deviation) in the year before surgery were 3.0 ± 1.4, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 4.0 ± 2.1, respectively. These significantly decreased to 2.3 ± 2.6, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.6, 0.0, and 3.1 ± 2.8 in the first year; 2.1 ± 2.8, 0.4 ± 1.0, 0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.6 ± 2.8 in the second year; and 2.0 ± 2.2, 0, 0.6 ± 1.7, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.8 ± 3.5 in the third year (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.001; Dunn’s test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). …”
-
56
-
57
-
58
Presentation 1_Decreased brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression in chronic kidney disease: integrated clinical and experimental evidence.pptx
Published 2025“…Single-cell mRNA sequencing further confirmed that Bdnf levels were lower in renal proximal tubule (PT) cells, macrophages (Mφ), and podocytes in UUO mice compared to normal controls, Additionally, Bdnf-as—a long non-coding RNA known to epigenetically repress BDNF—was significantly upregulated in proximal tubules of CKD patients based on human transcriptomic data. …”
-
59
-
60
Baseline patient characteristics.
Published 2025“…While mean respiratory rate was not affected, midazolam resulted in a significant decrease in both VRR (ß = −0.071, 95% CI: −0.120 to −0.021) and VTV (ß = −0.117, 95% CI: −0.170 to −0.062). …”