Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant non » significant gap (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant non » significant gap (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
-
741
The MTT assay and the LDH assay were used to assess the effects of the hydrogel component of MBC-005 on tumor cell number and cell death.
Published 2025“…<p>MC3T3-E1 cells (MC3) were used as a non-tumor cell control. (A) There was no statistically significant difference (NS) in MTT values between the MC3 cell cultures at 24- and 72-hours. …”
-
742
Cox proportional hazard ratios.
Published 2025“…Current locoregional therapies to treat breast cancer liver metastases are non-specific and have not produced significant increases in survival. …”
-
743
Bioluminescent Doubling Time.
Published 2025“…Current locoregional therapies to treat breast cancer liver metastases are non-specific and have not produced significant increases in survival. …”
-
744
Study Design.
Published 2025“…Current locoregional therapies to treat breast cancer liver metastases are non-specific and have not produced significant increases in survival. …”
-
745
Blood Pressure and LDL-C During Follow-up.
Published 2025“…The risk of cardiovascular death was significantly decreased (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.41–0.998, <i>P</i> = 0.049) and the risk of fracture non-significantly increased (HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.95–2.27, <i>P</i> = 0.08) in the intervention group compared to the control group.…”
-
746
Baseline Characteristics of Included Patients.
Published 2025“…The risk of cardiovascular death was significantly decreased (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.41–0.998, <i>P</i> = 0.049) and the risk of fracture non-significantly increased (HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.95–2.27, <i>P</i> = 0.08) in the intervention group compared to the control group.…”
-
747
Prevaelnce of different pathogens by location.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Diarrheal illness remains a major global health challenge, causing millions of deaths annually. Non-typhoidal <i>Salmonella</i> (NTS), Shiga toxin-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> (STEC), and <i>Campylobacter</i> species (CAMPY) significantly contribute to this burden. …”
-
748
Flow chart of the literature search.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
749
Funnel plot for scar thickness.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
750
Network plot for VSS score.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
751
Network plot for scar thickness.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
752
Funnel plot for VSS score.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
753
Characteristics of the included trials (n = 17).
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
754
Risk of bias graph.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
755
Network plot for VAS score.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
756
Funnel plot for VAS score.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
757
S1 File -
Published 2025“…</p><p>Materials and methods</p><p>The records of untreated and non-anesthetized adult Newfoundland dogs screened between 2010 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. …”
-
758
-
759
-
760
Participant flow (CONSORT diagram).
Published 2024“…Peak anti-<i>Na</i>-GST-1 IgG levels were observed between 2 and 4 weeks following the third dose, regardless of <i>Na</i>-GST-1 formulation. IgG levels decreased but remained significantly above baseline in all groups by day 290, at which point all participants (20 of 20 evaluable participants) still had detectable IgG. …”