Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant non » significant gap (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant non » significant gap (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
-
841
Sample size and duration of the pilot study.
Published 2025“…TB treatment adherence rates among TB patients using VOT was significantly better (<i>p</i><0.01) than those using DOTS.…”
-
842
-
843
-
844
-
845
-
846
-
847
-
848
-
849
-
850
-
851
-
852
-
853
Assessment of ascending aortic remodeling 2 weeks after transverse aortic constriction (TAC) in male mice.
Published 2025“…N = 7 and 6 in the WT and <i>Myh11</i><sup>E1892D/E1892D</sup> groups, respectively. ns, non-significant; * <i>P</i> < 0.05, *** <i>P</i> < 0.001, by unpaired Mann-Whitney analysis.…”
-
854
Assessment of left ventricular (LV) remodeling 2 weeks after transverse aortic constriction (TAC) in male mice.
Published 2025“…N = 7 and 6 in the WT and <i>Myh11</i><sup>E1892D/E1892D</sup> groups, respectively. ns, non-significant; * <i>P</i> < 0.05, ** <i>P</i> < 0.01, *** <i>P</i> < 0.001, by unpaired Mann-Whitney analysis.…”
-
855
-
856
-
857
-
858
Histopathological analysis of ascending aorta and heart tissue 2 weeks after transverse aortic constriction (TAC) in female mice.
Published 2025“…N = 7 females in each group. ns, non-significant; * <i>P</i> < 0.05, ** <i>P</i> < 0.01, by unpaired Mann-Whitney analysis.…”
-
859
-
860