Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant point » significant amount (Expand Search), significant part (Expand Search), significant event (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant point » significant amount (Expand Search), significant part (Expand Search), significant event (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
-
1001
-
1002
-
1003
Sample size in each occupational subgroup.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, an increase of one point in work ability score leads to a decrease in WMSDs in the neck, wrists/hands, low back and hips/thighs regions by 13.5%, 8%, 11.5%, and 9%, respectively.…”
-
1004
Correlation between different study variables.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, an increase of one point in work ability score leads to a decrease in WMSDs in the neck, wrists/hands, low back and hips/thighs regions by 13.5%, 8%, 11.5%, and 9%, respectively.…”
-
1005
Study flow diagram.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, an increase of one point in work ability score leads to a decrease in WMSDs in the neck, wrists/hands, low back and hips/thighs regions by 13.5%, 8%, 11.5%, and 9%, respectively.…”
-
1006
Final data used in the study.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, an increase of one point in work ability score leads to a decrease in WMSDs in the neck, wrists/hands, low back and hips/thighs regions by 13.5%, 8%, 11.5%, and 9%, respectively.…”
-
1007
Demographic characteristics of participants.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, an increase of one point in work ability score leads to a decrease in WMSDs in the neck, wrists/hands, low back and hips/thighs regions by 13.5%, 8%, 11.5%, and 9%, respectively.…”
-
1008
-
1009
Schematic model depicting the relationship between lipids and proteins by target gene knockdown.
Published 2025“…Non-significant but decreasing trends are marked with small light blue arrows pointing downwards. …”
-
1010
GNB1 and SCARB2 involvement in lipid metabolism of human subcutaneous adipocytes.
Published 2025“…In the schematic diagram, significant increases are indicated by red arrows pointing upwards, while significant decreases are shown by blue arrows pointing downwards. …”
-
1011
Dataset visualization diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
1012
Dataset sample images.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
1013
Performance comparison of different models.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
1014
C2f and BC2f module structure diagrams.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
1015
YOLOv8n detection results diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
1016
YOLOv8n-BWG model structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
1017
BiFormer structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
1018
YOLOv8n-BWG detection results diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
1019
GSConv module structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
1020
Performance comparison of three loss functions.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”