Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant promise » significant rise (Expand Search), significant progress (Expand Search), significant positive (Expand Search)
promise decrease » point decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant promise » significant rise (Expand Search), significant progress (Expand Search), significant positive (Expand Search)
promise decrease » point decrease (Expand Search)
-
121
-
122
-
123
-
124
-
125
-
126
-
127
-
128
-
129
-
130
Proposed Alzheimer’s disease classification pipeline using Multi-Scale EfficientNet with SVM.
Published 2025Subjects: -
131
-
132
Imaging CDK4/6 Broaden Options of Breast Cancer Diagnostics with Positron Emission Tomography
Published 2025Subjects: -
133
Imaging CDK4/6 Broaden Options of Breast Cancer Diagnostics with Positron Emission Tomography
Published 2025Subjects: -
134
Imaging CDK4/6 Broaden Options of Breast Cancer Diagnostics with Positron Emission Tomography
Published 2025Subjects: -
135
Imaging CDK4/6 Broaden Options of Breast Cancer Diagnostics with Positron Emission Tomography
Published 2025Subjects: -
136
Imaging CDK4/6 Broaden Options of Breast Cancer Diagnostics with Positron Emission Tomography
Published 2025Subjects: -
137
Imaging CDK4/6 Broaden Options of Breast Cancer Diagnostics with Positron Emission Tomography
Published 2025Subjects: -
138
Imaging CDK4/6 Broaden Options of Breast Cancer Diagnostics with Positron Emission Tomography
Published 2025Subjects: -
139
S1 File -
Published 2024“…Repeated measurements analysis showed a significant decrease in variability of the LV- and RV-GLS score differences between the expert and trainees over time (<i>p</i><sub>adj</sub><0.001), which was not significantly different between trainees. …”
-
140
GLS analysis with 2D-STE software.
Published 2024“…Repeated measurements analysis showed a significant decrease in variability of the LV- and RV-GLS score differences between the expert and trainees over time (<i>p</i><sub>adj</sub><0.001), which was not significantly different between trainees. …”