Search alternatives:
significant promoting » significant proportion (Expand Search), significant promise (Expand Search), significantly promoted (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
promoting decrease » proportional decrease (Expand Search)
significant promoting » significant proportion (Expand Search), significant promise (Expand Search), significantly promoted (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
promoting decrease » proportional decrease (Expand Search)
-
3721
Treatment with vitamin D3 reduced the viability of cancer cell lines: <i>1A & 1B.</i>
Published 2025“…Mouse EAC cells showed a decrease in cell viability starting from 250 µM at 24h of treatment. …”
-
3722
-
3723
Vitamin D3, but not the Cisplatin, could moderately reduce STZ-induced hyperglycemia in mice (a) Schematic representation of experimental protocol followed in the study: After accl...
Published 2025“…(c) Vitamin D3 and the positive control Cisplatin differently modulated FBG in hyperglycaemic mice: Intraperitoneal administration of vitamin D3 very minimally decreased FBG compared to vehicle control at the end of the study. …”
-
3724
Changes in the active H3K27ac and repressive H3K27me3 histone marks among Vasa2+/Piwi1+ and all cells in fed, starved, and refed juvenile polyps.
Published 2025“…Between fed, T<sub>5ds</sub> and T<sub>20ds</sub> timepoints, MFI levels of H3K27ac progressively and significantly decreased while levels H3K27me3 (M) did not change significantly (N). …”
-
3725
-
3726
The TOR inhibitors Rapamycin and AZD-8055 strongly reduce RPS6 phosphorylation and cell proliferation in Vasa2+/Piwi1+ cells.
Published 2025“…<i>n</i> = 2–4 biological replicates per condition, with 15 individuals per replicate. Significance levels for Student <i>t</i> test are indicated for adjusted <i>p</i> values: *<i>p</i> < 0.05, ***<i>p</i> < 0.001, ***<i>p</i> < 0.0001. d: day(s), n.s.: non-significant. …”
-
3727
-
3728
Testing set error.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
-
3729
Internal structure of an LSTM cell.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
-
3730
Prediction effect of each model after STL.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
-
3731
The kernel density plot for data of each feature.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
-
3732
Analysis of raw data prediction results.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
-
3733
Flowchart of the STL.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
-
3734
SARIMA predicts season components.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
-
3735
BWO-BiLSTM model prediction results.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
-
3736
Bi-LSTM architecture diagram.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
-
3737
STL Linear Combination Forecast Graph.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
-
3738
LOSS curves for BWO-BiLSTM model training.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
-
3739
Analysis of STL-PCA prediction results.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
-
3740
Accumulated contribution rate of PCA.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”