Search alternatives:
significant reductions » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant predictors (Expand Search), significant variations (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
reductions decrease » reduction decreased (Expand Search)
significant reductions » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant predictors (Expand Search), significant variations (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
reductions decrease » reduction decreased (Expand Search)
-
661
Summary table showing analysis of randomized controlled trials stratified based on age groups.
Published 2025Subjects: -
662
Meta-analysis showing the overall effect of different statin types versus placebo for
Published 2025Subjects: -
663
Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized controlled trials.
Published 2025Subjects: -
664
Analysis of randomized controlled trials stratified based on treatment duration.
Published 2025Subjects: -
665
-
666
-
667
-
668
-
669
Sectioning method.
Published 2025“…In contrast, compressive residual stresses in mid-panel regions decrease by up to 72.2% with an increase in width-to-thickness ratio from 3.0 to 23.0, and the reduction rate is influenced by plate thickness. …”
-
670
Parametric studies.
Published 2025“…In contrast, compressive residual stresses in mid-panel regions decrease by up to 72.2% with an increase in width-to-thickness ratio from 3.0 to 23.0, and the reduction rate is influenced by plate thickness. …”
-
671
FEM of HSS welded box-section.
Published 2025“…In contrast, compressive residual stresses in mid-panel regions decrease by up to 72.2% with an increase in width-to-thickness ratio from 3.0 to 23.0, and the reduction rate is influenced by plate thickness. …”
-
672
Width of the tension region.
Published 2025“…In contrast, compressive residual stresses in mid-panel regions decrease by up to 72.2% with an increase in width-to-thickness ratio from 3.0 to 23.0, and the reduction rate is influenced by plate thickness. …”
-
673
Schematic diagram of specimens [5].
Published 2025“…In contrast, compressive residual stresses in mid-panel regions decrease by up to 72.2% with an increase in width-to-thickness ratio from 3.0 to 23.0, and the reduction rate is influenced by plate thickness. …”
-
674
Different welding sequences.
Published 2025“…In contrast, compressive residual stresses in mid-panel regions decrease by up to 72.2% with an increase in width-to-thickness ratio from 3.0 to 23.0, and the reduction rate is influenced by plate thickness. …”
-
675
Weld types for box-section members.
Published 2025“…In contrast, compressive residual stresses in mid-panel regions decrease by up to 72.2% with an increase in width-to-thickness ratio from 3.0 to 23.0, and the reduction rate is influenced by plate thickness. …”
-
676
Geometrical parameters of specimens [5].
Published 2025“…In contrast, compressive residual stresses in mid-panel regions decrease by up to 72.2% with an increase in width-to-thickness ratio from 3.0 to 23.0, and the reduction rate is influenced by plate thickness. …”
-
677
Residual stresses versus steel strength.
Published 2025“…In contrast, compressive residual stresses in mid-panel regions decrease by up to 72.2% with an increase in width-to-thickness ratio from 3.0 to 23.0, and the reduction rate is influenced by plate thickness. …”
-
678
pone.0332445.t008 -
Published 2025“…In contrast, compressive residual stresses in mid-panel regions decrease by up to 72.2% with an increase in width-to-thickness ratio from 3.0 to 23.0, and the reduction rate is influenced by plate thickness. …”
-
679
Temperature distribution during welding.
Published 2025“…In contrast, compressive residual stresses in mid-panel regions decrease by up to 72.2% with an increase in width-to-thickness ratio from 3.0 to 23.0, and the reduction rate is influenced by plate thickness. …”
-
680
Properties of 460 MPa HSS.
Published 2025“…In contrast, compressive residual stresses in mid-panel regions decrease by up to 72.2% with an increase in width-to-thickness ratio from 3.0 to 23.0, and the reduction rate is influenced by plate thickness. …”