Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant results » significant reductions (Expand Search), significant reduction (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant results » significant reductions (Expand Search), significant reduction (Expand Search)
-
1081
-
1082
-
1083
The Vancouver Scar Scale.
Published 2024“…We divided them into groups according to treatment methods, analyzed whether there were statistical differences in observation indexes among groups and the risk factors affecting breastfeeding rate and treatment satisfaction.</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
-
1084
S1 Dataset -
Published 2024“…We divided them into groups according to treatment methods, analyzed whether there were statistical differences in observation indexes among groups and the risk factors affecting breastfeeding rate and treatment satisfaction.</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
-
1085
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).
Published 2024“…We divided them into groups according to treatment methods, analyzed whether there were statistical differences in observation indexes among groups and the risk factors affecting breastfeeding rate and treatment satisfaction.</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
-
1086
Mammary fistula (n(%)).
Published 2024“…We divided them into groups according to treatment methods, analyzed whether there were statistical differences in observation indexes among groups and the risk factors affecting breastfeeding rate and treatment satisfaction.</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
-
1087
Forest maps affecting lactation outcomes.
Published 2024“…We divided them into groups according to treatment methods, analyzed whether there were statistical differences in observation indexes among groups and the risk factors affecting breastfeeding rate and treatment satisfaction.</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
-
1088
Postoperative drainage(ml) (M(IQR)).
Published 2024“…We divided them into groups according to treatment methods, analyzed whether there were statistical differences in observation indexes among groups and the risk factors affecting breastfeeding rate and treatment satisfaction.</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
-
1089
-
1090
-
1091
-
1092
-
1093
-
1094
-
1095
-
1096
-
1097
-
1098
-
1099
-
1100