Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant time » significant threat (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
time decrease » time increased (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant time » significant threat (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
time decrease » time increased (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
2821
Counting results on DRPD dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. At the same time, the model size was reduced by 9.3%, and the number of model layers was decreased, reducing computational costs and storage requirements. …”
-
2822
Quantitative results on RFRB dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. At the same time, the model size was reduced by 9.3%, and the number of model layers was decreased, reducing computational costs and storage requirements. …”
-
2823
Main module structure.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. At the same time, the model size was reduced by 9.3%, and the number of model layers was decreased, reducing computational costs and storage requirements. …”
-
2824
Counting results on MTDC-UAV dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. At the same time, the model size was reduced by 9.3%, and the number of model layers was decreased, reducing computational costs and storage requirements. …”
-
2825
Quantitative results on DRPD dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. At the same time, the model size was reduced by 9.3%, and the number of model layers was decreased, reducing computational costs and storage requirements. …”
-
2826
Architecture of MAR-YOLOv9.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. At the same time, the model size was reduced by 9.3%, and the number of model layers was decreased, reducing computational costs and storage requirements. …”
-
2827
Quantitative results on MTDC-UAV dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. At the same time, the model size was reduced by 9.3%, and the number of model layers was decreased, reducing computational costs and storage requirements. …”
-
2828
Counting results on WEDU dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. At the same time, the model size was reduced by 9.3%, and the number of model layers was decreased, reducing computational costs and storage requirements. …”
-
2829
Example images from four plant datasets.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. At the same time, the model size was reduced by 9.3%, and the number of model layers was decreased, reducing computational costs and storage requirements. …”
-
2830
Counting results on RFRB dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. At the same time, the model size was reduced by 9.3%, and the number of model layers was decreased, reducing computational costs and storage requirements. …”
-
2831
Detection visualization results on WEDU dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. At the same time, the model size was reduced by 9.3%, and the number of model layers was decreased, reducing computational costs and storage requirements. …”
-
2832
Mean GHQ scores (2019- September 2021).
Published 2024“…<div><p>Aims</p><p>To explore the prevalence of a mental health gender gap within a young adult sample during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to identify the impact of loneliness and domestic time use on young people’s, and particularly young women’s mental health.…”
-
2833
Driving variables recorded from the simulator.
Published 2025“…Additionally, HF conversation was associated with a decrease in ART among conservative participants, while it significantly increased TIBL for both moderate and conservative groups. …”
-
2834
Evaluation results of eye detection approaches.
Published 2024“…Half and quarter selection times decreased over 30% on average while maintaining accuracy, with overall task completion 20% faster. …”
-
2835
Shows the block diagram of ResNet34.
Published 2024“…Half and quarter selection times decreased over 30% on average while maintaining accuracy, with overall task completion 20% faster. …”
-
2836
Initial assessment of βHB treatment effects.
Published 2024“…C) Water consumption was decreased on day 1 (p<0.0001) and was not affected by treatment at all times assessed (all p≥0.0970). …”
-
2837
Effects of βHB treatment on edema and NDS 3 days after ICH.
Published 2024“…<p>A) In experiment 2, body weight was decreased on day 1 after ICH (p<0.0001), but not different between treatment groups at all times assessed (all p≥0.2118). …”
-
2838
Data Sheet 1_The dynamics of lowland river sections of Danube and Tisza in the Carpathian basin.pdf
Published 2025“…Almost all the water level and discharge records indicate a decadal decreasing trend for annual maximum values. The timing (day of the year) for annual maxima and minima is evaluated. …”
-
2839
The effect of EDF derived from <i>E</i>. <i>coli</i> (in mid-logarithmic growth phase, OD = 0.6) on the MRSA and MSSA.
Published 2024“…<i>coli</i> 25922 plus sub-MIC rifampin (2 μg/ml), the CFUs were decreased over than 3 times (p<0.001). But the standard EDF alone as well as sub-MIC rifampin alone, didn’t have significant effect on the CFUs of the MRSA and MSSA strains; <b>(B)</b> The EDF derived from the clinical isolate of <i>E</i>. …”
-
2840
Participants inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Published 2024“…A multilevel modeling framework will be used for primary outcome analysis to account for the repeated observations nested within participants over time. Pairwise post-hoc simple effects tests will be conducted to confirm patterns of differences.…”