Mean lesion depth of the SDF test groups and the SDF-free group at baseline and post-cycling time points. by Suphanida Kaewkamchai (19762172)

Subjects:

Mean mineral density of the SDF test groups and the SDF-free group at baseline and post-cycling time points. by Suphanida Kaewkamchai (19762172)

Subjects:

Representative SEM images of the dentin surface topography of the three SDF test groups and the SDF-free group. by Suphanida Kaewkamchai (19762172)

Subjects:

Typical X-ray diffraction patterns of the dentin of the three SDF treated groups and the control group. by Suphanida Kaewkamchai (19762172)

Subjects:

The schematic illustration of the experimental process. by Suphanida Kaewkamchai (19762172)

Subjects:

The viability of <i>S</i>. <i>mutans</i> and <i>C</i>. <i>albicans</i> (log CFU/ml) and the wet weight of dual-species biofilms (mg) of the experimental and the control groups afte... by Suphanida Kaewkamchai (19762172)

Subjects:

Supplementary data: Flowchart of the study. by Suphanida Kaewkamchai (19762172)

Subjects:

Growth of Sf14 in various media. by Nykki D. Ross (20933968)

Growth of Sf14 in various media and temperatures. by Nykki D. Ross (20933968)

Growth of bacteria in various media and temperatures with or without Sf14 infection. by Nykki D. Ross (20933968)

Growth of bacteria in various media and temperatures with or without Sf14 infection. by Nykki D. Ross (20933968)

Schematic diagram of monitoring points and units. by Jie Zhao (49409)

Model monitoring points and units coordinates. by Jie Zhao (49409)

Preference for the EIA – conjoint results. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”

Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”

Sample attribute table. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”

Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”

Sample scenario description. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”

AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”

Methodological flowchart. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”