Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant units » significant anti (Expand Search), significant bias (Expand Search), significant insights (Expand Search)
units decrease » units increased (Expand Search), unit increase (Expand Search), visits decreased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant units » significant anti (Expand Search), significant bias (Expand Search), significant insights (Expand Search)
units decrease » units increased (Expand Search), unit increase (Expand Search), visits decreased (Expand Search)
-
361
Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
362
-
363
-
364
-
365
-
366
-
367
-
368
-
369
-
370
-
371
-
372
-
373
BMI distribution of study population using World Health Organisation (WHO) categories.
Published 2025Subjects: -
374
Concurrent mixed methods design diagram.
Published 2025“…It is hypothesised that: a) intervention sites will demonstrate more significant decreases in restrictive practice events and duration and physical injuries, compared to within-group baseline and control group, and b) measures of people’s experiences and perceptions and nurses’ outcomes and behaviours will improve, compared to within-group baseline. …”
-
375
The guiding map.
Published 2025“…It is hypothesised that: a) intervention sites will demonstrate more significant decreases in restrictive practice events and duration and physical injuries, compared to within-group baseline and control group, and b) measures of people’s experiences and perceptions and nurses’ outcomes and behaviours will improve, compared to within-group baseline. …”
-
376
-
377
-
378
-
379
-
380