Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant units » significant anti (Expand Search), significant bias (Expand Search), significant insights (Expand Search)
units decrease » units increased (Expand Search), unit increase (Expand Search), visits decreased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant units » significant anti (Expand Search), significant bias (Expand Search), significant insights (Expand Search)
units decrease » units increased (Expand Search), unit increase (Expand Search), visits decreased (Expand Search)
-
441
-
442
-
443
-
444
-
445
-
446
-
447
-
448
Profile of study locations and participants.
Published 2025“…In Ese-Odo, the prevalence decreased to 25.8% (95% CI: 23.0–29.0) from 39% at baseline (<i>d</i> = −34%, <i>p</i> = 0.00). …”
-
449
-
450
-
451
Interaction effect on average number of N-PTUs.
Published 2025“…However, ST translation difficulty significantly influenced TU processing. For the more difficult text, the APTU size decreased notably, the number of 1–6-word PTUs increased substantially, and the frequency of ≥ 7-word PTUs remained relatively stable. …”
-
452
The samples in some studies.
Published 2025“…However, ST translation difficulty significantly influenced TU processing. For the more difficult text, the APTU size decreased notably, the number of 1–6-word PTUs increased substantially, and the frequency of ≥ 7-word PTUs remained relatively stable. …”
-
453
Interaction effect on overall average of TUs.
Published 2025“…However, ST translation difficulty significantly influenced TU processing. For the more difficult text, the APTU size decreased notably, the number of 1–6-word PTUs increased substantially, and the frequency of ≥ 7-word PTUs remained relatively stable. …”
-
454
-
455
-
456
-
457
-
458
-
459
-
460
The clinical characteristic of patients.
Published 2025“…The curve fitting and threshold effect analysis revealed that when the rate of alert detection by an attending physician was between 18% and 59%, each unit increase in the rate corresponded to decreases in direct cost by 363.94 (−463.34, −264.55) $ and in total cost by 698.93 (−885.78, −512.07) $. …”