Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant we » significant i.e (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant we » significant i.e (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
61
Flow chart of the study.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
62
Summary statistics of the sample.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
63
Product attributes and attribute levels.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
64
Dataset used in this study.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
65
Definitions of the variables.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
66
A sample choice question without a warning label.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
67
A sample choice question with a warning label.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
68
Toroidal metamaterials.
Published 2025“…These findings suggest a significant decrease in the risk of electromagnetic exposure to human subjects by miniaturization. …”
-
69
Human tissue dielectric parameters.
Published 2025“…These findings suggest a significant decrease in the risk of electromagnetic exposure to human subjects by miniaturization. …”
-
70
Human head modeling.
Published 2025“…These findings suggest a significant decrease in the risk of electromagnetic exposure to human subjects by miniaturization. …”
-
71
Variations in SAR for individual organizations.
Published 2025“…These findings suggest a significant decrease in the risk of electromagnetic exposure to human subjects by miniaturization. …”
-
72
Predictive Significance of Glycosyltransferase-Related lncRNAs in Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis and Experimental Validation
Published 2025“…And the low-risk cohort exhibited increased immune infiltration and decreased tumor purity. Additionally, significant differences in tumor mutation profiles were observed, with the tumor mutation burden (TMB) being higher in the low-risk cohort, suggesting a potentially better response to immunotherapy. …”
-
73
-
74
-
75
-
76
-
77
-
78
-
79
Study selection criteria.
Published 2025“…</p><p>MDMA-AT demonstrated significant improvement in BDI-II score compared to PT (19.7-point vs. 10.8-point decrease, respectively; p = 0.003). …”
-
80
PICOS criteria for the SLR.
Published 2025“…</p><p>MDMA-AT demonstrated significant improvement in BDI-II score compared to PT (19.7-point vs. 10.8-point decrease, respectively; p = 0.003). …”