Showing 1,501 - 1,520 results of 2,767 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significantly ((a decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ))~', query time: 0.35s Refine Results
  1. 1501
  2. 1502

    Demographics of the study population. by Sohyun Park (78358)

    Published 2024
    “…OBH was a significant independent predictor of iPD, with a cutoff of 1.52 mm. …”
  3. 1503

    Table 3 - by Sohyun Park (78358)

    Published 2024
    “…OBH was a significant independent predictor of iPD, with a cutoff of 1.52 mm. …”
  4. 1504

    Opioid consumption data. by Wali U. Pirzada (22278071)

    Published 2025
    “…No significant difference was observed in the mean percentage of prescribed MMEs leftover between the two cohorts (Orthopaedic 47% vs. …”
  5. 1505

    Prescription data. by Wali U. Pirzada (22278071)

    Published 2025
    “…No significant difference was observed in the mean percentage of prescribed MMEs leftover between the two cohorts (Orthopaedic 47% vs. …”
  6. 1506

    Refill rate by surgical specialty. by Wali U. Pirzada (22278071)

    Published 2025
    “…No significant difference was observed in the mean percentage of prescribed MMEs leftover between the two cohorts (Orthopaedic 47% vs. …”
  7. 1507

    Noncontinuous data on opioid use. by Wali U. Pirzada (22278071)

    Published 2025
    “…No significant difference was observed in the mean percentage of prescribed MMEs leftover between the two cohorts (Orthopaedic 47% vs. …”
  8. 1508
  9. 1509

    Baseline characteristics of the study sample<sup>β</sup>μ. by Osama Mohamed Ibrahim (12006954)

    Published 2024
    “…A significant difference was observed in the proportion of DRP types between Active Group A and the Control Group. …”
  10. 1510

    The flow diagram of the study (CONSORT, 2010). by Osama Mohamed Ibrahim (12006954)

    Published 2024
    “…A significant difference was observed in the proportion of DRP types between Active Group A and the Control Group. …”
  11. 1511
  12. 1512

    Flowchart of the study population. by Gábor Szaló (22615130)

    Published 2025
    “…Among those 803 individuals who did not take antihypertensive medication, there was a significant association in linear regression between increase in PSS-10 and decrease in C2 (B: −0.2, 95% CI: −0.4- −0.02; p = 0.03) that was lost after adjustment for physical activity (B: −0.16, 95% CI: −0.35–0.03; p = 0.1). …”
  13. 1513

    Characteristics of study population. by Gábor Szaló (22615130)

    Published 2025
    “…Among those 803 individuals who did not take antihypertensive medication, there was a significant association in linear regression between increase in PSS-10 and decrease in C2 (B: −0.2, 95% CI: −0.4- −0.02; p = 0.03) that was lost after adjustment for physical activity (B: −0.16, 95% CI: −0.35–0.03; p = 0.1). …”
  14. 1514

    Differences in mean scores of upper extremity performance in all five accelerometer-derived variables across four time points- pre-HABIT, post-HABIT, 3-month, and 6-month post-HABI... by Shailesh S. Gardas (20490020)

    Published 2024
    “…The trends seen in the line graphs above indicate a decrease in all the accelerometer derived variables at 3-month time point (except use ratio) suggesting decrease in bimanual performance. …”
  15. 1515
  16. 1516
  17. 1517
  18. 1518
  19. 1519

    This is the data correction file. by Pitchaporn Sonuch (11785736)

    Published 2024
    “…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>The combined intervention significantly decreased systolic blood pressure and showed a trend towards reduced urine sodium excretion in hypertensive patients. …”
  20. 1520

    Flow diagram of participants. by Pitchaporn Sonuch (11785736)

    Published 2024
    “…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>The combined intervention significantly decreased systolic blood pressure and showed a trend towards reduced urine sodium excretion in hypertensive patients. …”