Forest plot for PaO₂. by Xuqin Du (8803772)

“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO₂ (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO₂ (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”

Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 3_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

<b>Exploring left lateral decubitus position, and its influence on infant mortality in pregnant women in their third trimester, brought to the emergency through the GVK Ambulance S... by Laggy George (19873020)

“…</p><p dir="ltr">Conclusion:</p><p dir="ltr">Transporting mothers in a Left Lateral Decubitus position may significantly decrease the odds of Infant mortality by 62%; after adjusting for antenatal care visits. …”

The impact of excessive DNA amounts used for bisulfite conversion on the amplification efficiency and the methylation level of <i>LINE-1</i> and <i>Alu</i>. by Trang Thi Quynh Tran (20485595)

“…(<b>D, E</b>) An increase in methylation level of <i>LINE-1</i> (D) and <i>Alu</i> (E) was associated with a decrease in DNA input for bisulfite conversion. …”

SEAwise Report on improved predictive models of growth, production and stock quality under different habitat scenarios and incorporating experimental results by Leire Ibaibarriaga (13760979)

“…Summer temperature was not a significant driver of the individual growth. …”

Chromosomal partitioning is maintained during intracellular UPEC coccobacilli divisions. by Alaska Pokhrel (9566813)

“…Intensity plot in <b>f</b>, shows FtsZ constriction over 60 min (inset show HupA-RFP fluorescence profiles taken perpendicular to the Z-ring, with no intensity decrease at midcell over the same time interval). …”

Soil analysis results of the trial areas. by Beyza Ciftci (20895403)

“…While increasing irrigation levels increased oil content, higher nitrogen doses caused a decrease for it. The highest oil content (6.64%) was recorded with 100% irrigation and 0 kg ha ⁻ ¹ N application. …”

Local details of carbon storage. by Mengting Jin (1888933)

“…By 2035, cropland, forest, water, and construction land areas are expected to increase, while grassland and unused land areas are projected to decrease. Under the ecological protection scenario, cropland, forest land, and grassland—major main contributors to carbon storage—will be effectively conserved to some extent. (2) From 2000 to 2020, Xinjiang’s carbon storage capacity exhibited an overall increasing trend, with a cumulative increase of 137.515×10⁵ t and a growth rate of 1.58%. …”

Land-use type areas in Xinjiang. by Mengting Jin (1888933)

“…By 2035, cropland, forest, water, and construction land areas are expected to increase, while grassland and unused land areas are projected to decrease. Under the ecological protection scenario, cropland, forest land, and grassland—major main contributors to carbon storage—will be effectively conserved to some extent. (2) From 2000 to 2020, Xinjiang’s carbon storage capacity exhibited an overall increasing trend, with a cumulative increase of 137.515×10⁵ t and a growth rate of 1.58%. …”

Yield response factors of sorghum. by Beyza Ciftci (20895403)

“…While increasing irrigation levels increased oil content, higher nitrogen doses caused a decrease for it. The highest oil content (6.64%) was recorded with 100% irrigation and 0 kg ha ⁻ ¹ N application. …”

Projected LULC of BMNP (2033 and 2053). by Firdissa Sadeta Tiye (21222102)

“…The analysis revealed significant LULC changes in BMNP, from 1993 to 2023, primarily due to anthropogenic activities, with further changes anticipated between 2023 and 2053.The results showed a notable increase in woodland and shrubs at the expense of grassland and Erica forest. …”