Standard deviation of the difference between the RV-GLS value of the expert and trainees in four consecutive groups of 25 fetal heart clips. by Chantelle M. de Vet (16535257)

Subjects:

ICC of each trainee RV-GLS value compared with the expert in four consecutive groups of 25 fetal heart clips. by Chantelle M. de Vet (16535257)

Subjects:

ICC of each trainee LV-GLS value compared with the expert in four consecutive groups of 25 fetal heart clips. by Chantelle M. de Vet (16535257)

Subjects:

Mean of the difference between the RV-GLS value of the expert and trainees in four consecutive groups of 25 fetal heart clips. by Chantelle M. de Vet (16535257)

Subjects:

Mean of the difference between the LV-GLS value of the expert and trainees in four consecutive groups of 25 fetal heart clips. by Chantelle M. de Vet (16535257)

Subjects:

S1 File - by Changxu Wang (17826805)

Subjects:

The flow chart of the study. by Changxu Wang (17826805)

Subjects:

Comparison of postoperative NLR, PLR, and SII between the two groups. by Changxu Wang (17826805)

Subjects:

The tangential force between two particles with different equivalent diameters for P3: (a) elastic tangential contact force; (b) viscous tangential contact force. by Yongfeng Zhu (7361045)

Subjects:

Normalized significant family changes in abundance. by Karley K. Mahalak (3212670)

“…<p>A) <i>Erysipelotrichaceae</i> significantly increased with CCE treatment; B) <i>Bacteroidales_unclassified</i> significantly decreased with CCE treatment; C) <i>Desulfovibrionaceae</i> significantly decreased with CCE treatment; D) <i>Rikenellaceae</i> significantly decreased with CCE treatment; E) <i>Coriobacteriaceae</i> significantly decreased with CCE treatment; F) <i>Erysipelotrichaceae</i> significantly increased with TRE treatment.…”

Hypothesis 3: The mean difference between “Class 1” (a school attack happens within <i>k</i> kms. of a given school) and “Class 0” (no school attack happens within <i>k</i> kms. of... by Lirika Sola (21560710)

Manhattan plot for genome-wide association study (GWAS) in a European population with depression. by Xiaomei He (795333)

Subjects:

A summary of calibration standards (n = 3). by Ewa Paszkowska (21246702)

Subjects:

(A) The incidence of OME in the VA group compared to the non-VA group. (B) The rate of tympanostomy tube insertion in the VA group and non-VA group. by Miki Kashiwagi (21439684)

Subjects:

Baseline characteristics of the participants. by Jia Song (495396)

Subjects:

Three-dimensional visualization of the binary image, illustrating the spatial distribution and morphology of two distinct phases within a cubic volume. The black regions represent... by Mouad Klai (20818364)

Subjects:

Proportional contribution (median [Mdn], standard deviation [SD], and 95% credible intervals [CI]) of prey groups to the diet of piscivorous fishes in <i>A</i>. <i>gigas</i> coloni... by Danny Rejas (583637)

Subjects:

A comparison of Paraquat contamination^a numbers and percentages in different concentrations (unit:ppm). by Vivat Keawdounglek (9710710)

Subjects:

Effect of ex vivo treatment with rhTGFβ1 or a TGFβ1 inhibitor on monocyte responses to rgE stimulation. Monocytes and NK cells purified from PBMC collected from 10 RZV recipients (demographics in S4 Table) before vaccination (D0) and 90 days post-vaccination (D90) were combined ex vivo and stimulated with VZV-rgE. A subset of D0 monocyte & NK cocultures was also treated with the TGFβ1 inhibitor LY (D0 LY), and a subset of D90 cocultures were supplemented with rhTGFβ1. The graph shows individual data points, means and p values calculated by Friedman test for repeated measures with FDR correction. LY treatment of cells collected on D0 significantly increased their activation to levels similar to D90. Conversely, treatment of D90 cells with rhTGFβ1 significantly decreased their activation to levels similar to D0. by Michael J. Johnson (5818168)

“…Conversely, treatment of D90 cells with rhTGFβ1 significantly decreased their activation to levels similar to D0.…”

Summary of miRNAs sequencing data quality. by Zhaowen Tan (12283502)

Subjects: