Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
slight decrease » slight increase (Expand Search)
high decrease » high degree (Expand Search), high disease (Expand Search), weight decreased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
slight decrease » slight increase (Expand Search)
high decrease » high degree (Expand Search), high disease (Expand Search), weight decreased (Expand Search)
-
1881
Group error analysis of compressional time for the proposed GPR and some previous approaches.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1882
-
1883
-
1884
-
1885
-
1886
-
1887
-
1888
(a, b). The statistical error analyses for the models using the same dataset.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1889
The comparison of ν<sub>s</sub> – RHOB trends models with experimental measurements.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1890
-
1891
-
1892
-
1893
-
1894
-
1895
-
1896
Density differences between pre- and post-measurements for program completers (N = 160).
Published 2025Subjects: -
1897
-
1898
-
1899
Significant inter-relationships between baseline variables and MSCC or MCS.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1900
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”