Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
high decrease » slight decrease (Expand Search), high degree (Expand Search), high disease (Expand Search)
increase » increased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
high decrease » slight decrease (Expand Search), high degree (Expand Search), high disease (Expand Search)
increase » increased (Expand Search)
-
1781
Group error analysis of compressional time for the proposed GPR and some previous approaches.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1782
-
1783
-
1784
-
1785
-
1786
-
1787
-
1788
(a, b). The statistical error analyses for the models using the same dataset.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1789
The comparison of ν<sub>s</sub> – RHOB trends models with experimental measurements.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1790
-
1791
-
1792
-
1793
-
1794
-
1795
-
1796
Density differences between pre- and post-measurements for program completers (N = 160).
Published 2025Subjects: -
1797
-
1798
-
1799
Significant inter-relationships between baseline variables and MSCC or MCS.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1800
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”