Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
i decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
i decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1821
-
1822
-
1823
-
1824
S1 Data -
Published 2025“…Spatially, along the direction of groundwater flow, a general trend of increasing hydrochemical components was noted, with a significant rise in HCO<sub>3</sub>-Na type groundwater. (3) The spatiotemporal distribution and evolution of hydrochemistry were influenced by water-rock interactions, lithological characteristics, groundwater flow patterns, and human activities. …”
-
1825
-
1826
-
1827
-
1828
-
1829
-
1830
Table 1_PABPN1 as a pan-cancer biomarker: prognostic significance and association with tumor immune microenvironment.xlsx
Published 2025“…After down expression of PABPN1, mRNA expression levels of MRPS15 and GPx (Glutathione peroxidase) decreased significantly in T24, 5637 HLF and MCF-7 cells.…”
-
1831
Image 1_PABPN1 as a pan-cancer biomarker: prognostic significance and association with tumor immune microenvironment.tif
Published 2025“…After down expression of PABPN1, mRNA expression levels of MRPS15 and GPx (Glutathione peroxidase) decreased significantly in T24, 5637 HLF and MCF-7 cells.…”
-
1832
Data.
Published 2025“…The level of oxidative stress in sperm was significantly decreased after 24h of incubation with PRP at 2% (p = 0.001), 5% (p = 0.001) and 10% (p = 0.001) when compared to the control group. …”
-
1833
Semen characteristics in the study population.
Published 2025“…The level of oxidative stress in sperm was significantly decreased after 24h of incubation with PRP at 2% (p = 0.001), 5% (p = 0.001) and 10% (p = 0.001) when compared to the control group. …”
-
1834
-
1835
-
1836
-
1837
-
1838
-
1839
-
1840