Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
less decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
less decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
261
Illustration of BSC control using ANN for WECS.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
262
d-axis current.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
263
System parameters.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
264
q-axis current.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
265
Schematic representation of WECS.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
266
THD for the stator current i<sub>sb</sub> (ANN-BSC).
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
267
THD for the stator current i<sub>sb</sub> (OTC-FOC).
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
268
GRADE judgements.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
269
Basic characteristics of the included studies.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
270
The data of meta-analysis.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
271
Risk of bias.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
272
Overall risk of bias assessment.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
273
Funnel plot of VO<sub>2Peak</sub> inclusion studies.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
274
Analysis of subgroups.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
275
-
276
-
277
Demographic information.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The analysis revealed moderate to high levels of stress, anxiety, and depression among medical students, along with decreased life satisfaction. Regression analysis showed that problem-focused coping positively impacted medical students’ psychological wellbeing, whereas emotion-focused and avoidance coping showed less favourable effects. …”
-
278
-
279
-
280