Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
less decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
less decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
41
Major hyperparameters of RF-SVR.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
42
Pseudo code for coupling model execution process.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
43
Major hyperparameters of RF-MLPR.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
44
Results of RF algorithm screening factors.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
45
Schematic diagram of the basic principles of SVR.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
46
-
47
-
48
Participant characteristics by village.
Published 2025“…Nearly all participants reported perceiving increases in temperature (94%) and decreases in rainfall (91%) in the previous five years, and most reported that they expect to have much less (57%) or somewhat less (35%) food to feed their families in the future due to changes in temperature and rainfall. …”
-
49
-
50
-
51
-
52
-
53
Flowchart of the study.
Published 2024“…At genus level, an increase in the relative abundances of <i>Bergeyella</i> and <i>Corynebacterium</i> were significantly associated with a greater reduction in bleeding in the Placebo group and with less reduction in bleeding in the Probiotic group, respectively. …”
-
54
Flow chart for inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Published 2025“…The strength of the association was assessed using an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. …”
-
55
Parameters of screws.
Published 2025“…The LMS screw yielded a pullout strength of 168.3 N, showing statistically less strength compared with the 2 types of CPS screws.…”
-
56
Data.
Published 2025“…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”
-
57
Baseline characteristics of patients.
Published 2025“…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”
-
58
S5 Fig - The human medial temporal lobe represents memory items in their ordinal position in both declarative and motor memory domains
Published 2025“…This effect was less pronounced in the PHC, PER and HC, where a decrease in similarity was only observed in lag 5 compared to other lags (lag 5 < 2–4, all <i>p</i><sub><i>corr</i></sub> < .05 and lag 5 < 1, in HC only, <i>p</i><sub><i>corr</i></sub> < .005). …”
-
59
Qualitative changes in the implant subgroup.
Published 2025“…Eyes with the implant showed greater leukocyte infiltration and less type I collagen compared to the group without implants. …”
-
60
Results of the colorimetric MTT test.
Published 2025“…Eyes with the implant showed greater leukocyte infiltration and less type I collagen compared to the group without implants. …”