Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
less decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
less decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
3501
-
3502
Minimal data set.
Published 2025“…Other markers of endothelial injury or inflammation were not significantly different between groups. No significant differences were observed in histologic injury scores and wet-to-dry ratios.…”
-
3503
-
3504
-
3505
-
3506
-
3507
-
3508
-
3509
-
3510
Electromagnetic torque ripple.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
3511
The evolution.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
3512
ANN architecture.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
3513
Electromagnetic torque ripple comparison.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
3514
Evolution.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
3515
Tip speed ratio.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
3516
ANN architecture and configuration.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
3517
Mechanical speed.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
3518
Wind speed profile.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
3519
Correlation coefficient (R).
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
3520
Electromagnetic torque.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”