Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
longer decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
longer decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
-
621
-
622
-
623
-
624
Comparison with Existing Studies.
Published 2025“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”
-
625
Specimen Preparation and Experimental Setup.
Published 2025“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”
-
626
UCS texts data.
Published 2025“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”
-
627
-
628
Altered expression of genes related to Ca<sup>2+</sup> cycling or myocardial contraction.
Published 2025Subjects: -
629
-
630
-
631
-
632
-
633
-
634
-
635
-
636
-
637
The table shows the significant and non-significant altered group with different parameters.
Published 2025Subjects: -
638
-
639
-
640
Supplementary file 1_Water stress reduces cellulose deposition in the cell wall and increases wax content, resulting in decreased fiber quality.docx
Published 2025“…At 30 DPA, compared to the WW treatment, the sucrose contents in SD217 and XC7 fibers decreased by 18.66% and 12.85%, while cellulose contents dropped by 9.91% and 17.17%, respectively, resulting in a significant decrease in the thickness of the cell walls by 10.59% and 9.50% respectively. …”