Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
1681
-
1682
-
1683
-
1684
-
1685
Accuracy on the ERAM task.
Published 2024“…However, coefficients for estrogen were significant for both emotion recognition tasks. Higher within-person levels of estrogen predicted lower accuracy, whereas higher between-person estrogen levels predicted greater accuracy. …”
-
1686
-
1687
-
1688
Summary of post-treatment disease course measures from MDMA-AT publications.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1689
Summary of post-treatment CAPS score changes from clinical trials with FDA-approved medications.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1690
-
1691
-
1692
Summary of post-treatment disease course measures from off-label medications clinical trials.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1693
Summary of post-treatment CAPS score changes from clinical trials with psychotherapies.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1694
Summary of clinical studies of FDA-approved medications for PTSD: Disease course outcomes.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1695
Summary of post-treatment disease course measures from clinical trials with psychotherapies.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1696
-
1697
Post-treatment CAPS score changes from clinical trials with off-label PTSD medications.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1698
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
-
1699
Criteria for study selection.
Published 2025“…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
-
1700