Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
2761
-
2762
-
2763
-
2764
Soil disturbance cross-sectional model.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, the subsoiling effect was further improved as the working speed decreased and the frequency of air blasts increased, satisfying the subsoiling operation assessment standards. …”
-
2765
Test plan table.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, the subsoiling effect was further improved as the working speed decreased and the frequency of air blasts increased, satisfying the subsoiling operation assessment standards. …”
-
2766
Gas jet subsoiling model.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, the subsoiling effect was further improved as the working speed decreased and the frequency of air blasts increased, satisfying the subsoiling operation assessment standards. …”
-
2767
Schematic diagram of the airflow passage.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, the subsoiling effect was further improved as the working speed decreased and the frequency of air blasts increased, satisfying the subsoiling operation assessment standards. …”
-
2768
Variation in soil penetration resistance.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, the subsoiling effect was further improved as the working speed decreased and the frequency of air blasts increased, satisfying the subsoiling operation assessment standards. …”
-
2769
Supersonic gas jet subsoiler experiment.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, the subsoiling effect was further improved as the working speed decreased and the frequency of air blasts increased, satisfying the subsoiling operation assessment standards. …”
-
2770
Effect of ex vivo treatment with rhTGFβ1 or a TGFβ1 inhibitor on monocyte responses to rgE stimulation. Monocytes and NK cells purified from PBMC collected from 10 RZV recipients (demographics in S4 Table) before vaccination (D0) and 90 days post-vaccination (D90) were combined ex vivo and stimulated with VZV-rgE. A subset of D0 monocyte & NK cocultures was also treated with the TGFβ1 inhibitor LY (D0 LY), and a subset of D90 cocultures were supplemented with rhTGFβ1. The graph shows individual data points, means and p values calculated by Friedman test for repeated measures with FDR correction. LY treatment of cells collected on D0 significantly increased their activation to levels similar to D90. Conversely, treatment of D90 cells with rhTGFβ1 significantly decreased their activation to levels similar to D0.
Published 2025“…Conversely, treatment of D90 cells with rhTGFβ1 significantly decreased their activation to levels similar to D0.…”
-
2771
-
2772
-
2773
-
2774
-
2775
-
2776
-
2777
-
2778
-
2779
-
2780