Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
14121
<b>Increasing ECM tree dominance enhances </b><b>soil </b><b>lignin </b><b>phenols </b><b>but suppresses microbial necromass contribution to soil organic carbon in a subtropical </...
Published 2025“…Our results indicated that ECM% did not affect SOC content but significantly altered SOC composition. Specifically, a higher ECM% promoted accumulation of plant-derived C and reduced microbial-derived C. …”
-
14122
Data Sheet 1_Global, regional, and national burden and trends of intracerebral hemorrhage among adolescents and young adults aged 15–39 years from 1990 to 2021: a comprehensive tre...
Published 2025“…Background<p>Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) poses a significant health challenge, notably affecting adolescents and young adults (AYAs) aged 15–39 years. …”
-
14123
Protein levels of Bcl-2 family markers in limbal stromal cells (LSCs) and in Aniridia-LSCs (AN-LSCs), after treatment with 0 µM, 50 µM and 75 µM Cobalt chloride (CoCl<sub>2</sub>),...
Published 2025“…<p>Data represent mean±SD from three independent experiments. Two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test was used, significant p values are indicated. …”
-
14124
-
14125
Data Sheet 1_A novel short-course, low-intensity blood-flow-restricted exercise (BFRE) regimen to study satellite cell function in critical illness survivors with sustained muscle...
Published 2025“…In controls, satellite cell content and MuRF1 transcript expression were significantly higher (1.53 ± 0.30- and 1.34 ± 0.31-fold difference, respectively) and myostatin transcript expression was significantly lower (0.58 ± 0.31-fold difference) in BFRE-trained versus untrained VL. …”
-
14126
<b>Efficacy of </b><b>GLP-1-based Therapies on</b><b> </b><b>Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic</b><b> Liver Disease and </b><b>Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated</b><b> Stea...
Published 2025“…Overall, GLP-1RAs treatment for a median of 24 weeks demonstrated a significant reduction in LFC by 5.21%, with the retatrutide displaying the most obvious treatment effects. …”
-
14127
<b>Data for opposing effects</b><b> of maize straw and its biochar on soil N</b><sub><strong>2</strong></sub><b>O emissions</b><b> </b><b>by mediating microbial nitrification and d...
Published 2025“…However, biochar addition (5 t C ha<sup>−1</sup>) reduced available N, i.e., 11.1–13.9% for NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, 11.0–14.8% for NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> and 13.8–16.6% WSON, and decreased the abundances of nitrification/denitrification genes (39.0–44.6% for AOB <i>amoA</i>, 29.5–35.5% for <i>nirK</i>, 24.4–31.8% for <i>nirS</i>) and associated genera <i>Nitrosospira</i>, <i>Mesorhizobium</i>, <i>Bradyrhizobium</i>, <i>Rhizobium</i>, <i>Pseudomonas</i>, and <i>Cupriavidus</i>. …”
-
14128
Image 4_PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase 3 RCT based meta-an...
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>Three RCTs (IMpower150, jRCT2080224500, and ORIENT-31) comprising a total of 1529 patients were analyzed. The PIBC regimen significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76 [0.66, 0.87], P < 0.0001), objective response rate (risk ratio [RR]: 1.36 [1.22, 1.51], P < 0.00001), and disease control rate (RR: 1.06 [1.00, 1.12], P = 0.04). …”
-
14129
Table 3_PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase 3 RCT based meta-an...
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>Three RCTs (IMpower150, jRCT2080224500, and ORIENT-31) comprising a total of 1529 patients were analyzed. The PIBC regimen significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76 [0.66, 0.87], P < 0.0001), objective response rate (risk ratio [RR]: 1.36 [1.22, 1.51], P < 0.00001), and disease control rate (RR: 1.06 [1.00, 1.12], P = 0.04). …”
-
14130
Image 2_PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase 3 RCT based meta-an...
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>Three RCTs (IMpower150, jRCT2080224500, and ORIENT-31) comprising a total of 1529 patients were analyzed. The PIBC regimen significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76 [0.66, 0.87], P < 0.0001), objective response rate (risk ratio [RR]: 1.36 [1.22, 1.51], P < 0.00001), and disease control rate (RR: 1.06 [1.00, 1.12], P = 0.04). …”
-
14131
Table 7_PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase 3 RCT based meta-an...
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>Three RCTs (IMpower150, jRCT2080224500, and ORIENT-31) comprising a total of 1529 patients were analyzed. The PIBC regimen significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76 [0.66, 0.87], P < 0.0001), objective response rate (risk ratio [RR]: 1.36 [1.22, 1.51], P < 0.00001), and disease control rate (RR: 1.06 [1.00, 1.12], P = 0.04). …”
-
14132
Table 8_PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase 3 RCT based meta-an...
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>Three RCTs (IMpower150, jRCT2080224500, and ORIENT-31) comprising a total of 1529 patients were analyzed. The PIBC regimen significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76 [0.66, 0.87], P < 0.0001), objective response rate (risk ratio [RR]: 1.36 [1.22, 1.51], P < 0.00001), and disease control rate (RR: 1.06 [1.00, 1.12], P = 0.04). …”
-
14133
Table 2_PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase 3 RCT based meta-an...
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>Three RCTs (IMpower150, jRCT2080224500, and ORIENT-31) comprising a total of 1529 patients were analyzed. The PIBC regimen significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76 [0.66, 0.87], P < 0.0001), objective response rate (risk ratio [RR]: 1.36 [1.22, 1.51], P < 0.00001), and disease control rate (RR: 1.06 [1.00, 1.12], P = 0.04). …”
-
14134
Image 3_PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase 3 RCT based meta-an...
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>Three RCTs (IMpower150, jRCT2080224500, and ORIENT-31) comprising a total of 1529 patients were analyzed. The PIBC regimen significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76 [0.66, 0.87], P < 0.0001), objective response rate (risk ratio [RR]: 1.36 [1.22, 1.51], P < 0.00001), and disease control rate (RR: 1.06 [1.00, 1.12], P = 0.04). …”
-
14135
Table 5_PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase 3 RCT based meta-an...
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>Three RCTs (IMpower150, jRCT2080224500, and ORIENT-31) comprising a total of 1529 patients were analyzed. The PIBC regimen significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76 [0.66, 0.87], P < 0.0001), objective response rate (risk ratio [RR]: 1.36 [1.22, 1.51], P < 0.00001), and disease control rate (RR: 1.06 [1.00, 1.12], P = 0.04). …”
-
14136
Table 6_PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase 3 RCT based meta-an...
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>Three RCTs (IMpower150, jRCT2080224500, and ORIENT-31) comprising a total of 1529 patients were analyzed. The PIBC regimen significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76 [0.66, 0.87], P < 0.0001), objective response rate (risk ratio [RR]: 1.36 [1.22, 1.51], P < 0.00001), and disease control rate (RR: 1.06 [1.00, 1.12], P = 0.04). …”
-
14137
Table 4_PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase 3 RCT based meta-an...
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>Three RCTs (IMpower150, jRCT2080224500, and ORIENT-31) comprising a total of 1529 patients were analyzed. The PIBC regimen significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76 [0.66, 0.87], P < 0.0001), objective response rate (risk ratio [RR]: 1.36 [1.22, 1.51], P < 0.00001), and disease control rate (RR: 1.06 [1.00, 1.12], P = 0.04). …”
-
14138
Image 1_PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase 3 RCT based meta-an...
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>Three RCTs (IMpower150, jRCT2080224500, and ORIENT-31) comprising a total of 1529 patients were analyzed. The PIBC regimen significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76 [0.66, 0.87], P < 0.0001), objective response rate (risk ratio [RR]: 1.36 [1.22, 1.51], P < 0.00001), and disease control rate (RR: 1.06 [1.00, 1.12], P = 0.04). …”
-
14139
Image 5_PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase 3 RCT based meta-an...
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>Three RCTs (IMpower150, jRCT2080224500, and ORIENT-31) comprising a total of 1529 patients were analyzed. The PIBC regimen significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76 [0.66, 0.87], P < 0.0001), objective response rate (risk ratio [RR]: 1.36 [1.22, 1.51], P < 0.00001), and disease control rate (RR: 1.06 [1.00, 1.12], P = 0.04). …”
-
14140
Table 1_PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase 3 RCT based meta-an...
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>Three RCTs (IMpower150, jRCT2080224500, and ORIENT-31) comprising a total of 1529 patients were analyzed. The PIBC regimen significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76 [0.66, 0.87], P < 0.0001), objective response rate (risk ratio [RR]: 1.36 [1.22, 1.51], P < 0.00001), and disease control rate (RR: 1.06 [1.00, 1.12], P = 0.04). …”