بدائل البحث:
significant decrease » significant increase (توسيع البحث), significantly increased (توسيع البحث)
point increase » unit increase (توسيع البحث)
significant decrease » significant increase (توسيع البحث), significantly increased (توسيع البحث)
point increase » unit increase (توسيع البحث)
-
701
Top view of the experimental setup.
منشور في 2025"…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …"
-
702
Amplitude for A/L = 0.338.
منشور في 2025"…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …"
-
703
Parameters of energy harvesting.
منشور في 2025"…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …"
-
704
Graph for Max Amplitude/Length at G<sub>y</sub> = 0.
منشور في 2025"…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …"
-
705
Amplitude for A/L = 0.02.
منشور في 2025"…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …"
-
706
Graph for maximum Frequency at G<sub>y</sub> = 0.
منشور في 2025"…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …"
-
707
Graph for maximum Power at G<sub>y</sub> = 0.
منشور في 2025"…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …"
-
708
Amplitude for A/L = 0.03.
منشور في 2025"…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …"
-
709
Summary of experimentation results.
منشور في 2025"…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …"
-
710
Piezoelectric eel.
منشور في 2025"…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …"
-
711
-
712
-
713
-
714
-
715
-
716
-
717
-
718
Association between FF Proximity and BMI by sex.
منشور في 2025"…An exponential decrease in FF proximity was associated with 0.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (p < 0.001) increase in BMI among males and 0.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (p < 0.05) decrease among females. …"
-
719
-
720