SNAP-25 (1-197) binds to syntaxin-1A, and the interaction is enhanced by Ser187 phosphorylation. by Dilara Koc (22431017)

“…Syntaxin-1A intensity normalized to SNAP-25 levels in each IP blot was quantified. ns: non-significant; *: P ≤ 0.05; **: P ≤ 0.01; ***: P ≤ 0.001. …”

Table 1_Overcoming tet(X)-harboring tigecycline resistance: a study on the efficacy of tigecycline-apramycin combinations.docx by Juan Liu (6492)

“…</p>Methods<p>In this study, we evaluated the synergism of tigecycline combining with other antibiotics as a means of overcoming the tet(X)-mediated resistance in Acinetobacter spp. …”

Table 3_Do the diagnosis-related group payment reforms have a negative impact?—an empirical study from Western China.docx by Jia-Yi Wang (490704)

“…In the treatment group hospitals, the primary beneficiaries of the reform were urban employees’ basic medical insurance patients, whose costs decreased by 4.9% (p < 0.01), with a non-significant effect on out-of-pocket payment patients and free medical care patients; the hospitals in the treatment group tended to reduce the use of Chinese medicine unique diagnostic and therapeutic means and increase the proportion of western medicine treatments under the pressure of the supremacy of costs.…”

Table 2_Do the diagnosis-related group payment reforms have a negative impact?—an empirical study from Western China.xlsx by Jia-Yi Wang (490704)

“…In the treatment group hospitals, the primary beneficiaries of the reform were urban employees’ basic medical insurance patients, whose costs decreased by 4.9% (p < 0.01), with a non-significant effect on out-of-pocket payment patients and free medical care patients; the hospitals in the treatment group tended to reduce the use of Chinese medicine unique diagnostic and therapeutic means and increase the proportion of western medicine treatments under the pressure of the supremacy of costs.…”

Table 1_Do the diagnosis-related group payment reforms have a negative impact?—an empirical study from Western China.xlsx by Jia-Yi Wang (490704)

“…In the treatment group hospitals, the primary beneficiaries of the reform were urban employees’ basic medical insurance patients, whose costs decreased by 4.9% (p < 0.01), with a non-significant effect on out-of-pocket payment patients and free medical care patients; the hospitals in the treatment group tended to reduce the use of Chinese medicine unique diagnostic and therapeutic means and increase the proportion of western medicine treatments under the pressure of the supremacy of costs.…”