Image 1_Interactions between the intestinal microbiome and host genes in regulating vibriosis resistance in Cynoglossus semilaevis.jpeg by Weiwei Zheng (140828)

“…</p>Results<p>Obvious histopathological differences were observed between the resistant and susceptible groups in terms of inflammatory cells infiltration, and tissue dissociation of mucosal layer. 16S rRNA sequencing analysis indicated that Vibrio increased but Stenotrophomonas, Chryseobacterium, Delftia, and Salinivibrio decreased in the susceptible group. Compared to the control group, 1,986 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected in the susceptible group, significantly more than the 310 DEGs found in the resistant group. …”

Table 9_Interactions between the intestinal microbiome and host genes in regulating vibriosis resistance in Cynoglossus semilaevis.xlsx by Weiwei Zheng (140828)

“…</p>Results<p>Obvious histopathological differences were observed between the resistant and susceptible groups in terms of inflammatory cells infiltration, and tissue dissociation of mucosal layer. 16S rRNA sequencing analysis indicated that Vibrio increased but Stenotrophomonas, Chryseobacterium, Delftia, and Salinivibrio decreased in the susceptible group. Compared to the control group, 1,986 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected in the susceptible group, significantly more than the 310 DEGs found in the resistant group. …”

Table 3_Ten-year outcomes of repeat keratoplasty for optical indications.docx by Victoria Grace Dimacali (20597690)

“…Cox multiple regression analysis showed male gender (p = 0.023), PK regraft (p = 0.003), regraft rejection (p = 0.003), and initial graft indications of pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (p = 0.005) and aphakic bullous keratopathy (p = 0.004) to be risk factors for regraft failure, while longer time to regraft was associated with decreased risk of failure (p = 0.013).</p>Conclusion<p>Performing EK for failed optical PK or EK significantly improved regraft survival compared to repeat PK. …”

Table 8_Interactions between the intestinal microbiome and host genes in regulating vibriosis resistance in Cynoglossus semilaevis.xlsx by Weiwei Zheng (140828)

“…</p>Results<p>Obvious histopathological differences were observed between the resistant and susceptible groups in terms of inflammatory cells infiltration, and tissue dissociation of mucosal layer. 16S rRNA sequencing analysis indicated that Vibrio increased but Stenotrophomonas, Chryseobacterium, Delftia, and Salinivibrio decreased in the susceptible group. Compared to the control group, 1,986 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected in the susceptible group, significantly more than the 310 DEGs found in the resistant group. …”

Table 4_Ten-year outcomes of repeat keratoplasty for optical indications.docx by Victoria Grace Dimacali (20597690)

“…Cox multiple regression analysis showed male gender (p = 0.023), PK regraft (p = 0.003), regraft rejection (p = 0.003), and initial graft indications of pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (p = 0.005) and aphakic bullous keratopathy (p = 0.004) to be risk factors for regraft failure, while longer time to regraft was associated with decreased risk of failure (p = 0.013).</p>Conclusion<p>Performing EK for failed optical PK or EK significantly improved regraft survival compared to repeat PK. …”

Table 6_Interactions between the intestinal microbiome and host genes in regulating vibriosis resistance in Cynoglossus semilaevis.xlsx by Weiwei Zheng (140828)

“…</p>Results<p>Obvious histopathological differences were observed between the resistant and susceptible groups in terms of inflammatory cells infiltration, and tissue dissociation of mucosal layer. 16S rRNA sequencing analysis indicated that Vibrio increased but Stenotrophomonas, Chryseobacterium, Delftia, and Salinivibrio decreased in the susceptible group. Compared to the control group, 1,986 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected in the susceptible group, significantly more than the 310 DEGs found in the resistant group. …”

Table 7_Interactions between the intestinal microbiome and host genes in regulating vibriosis resistance in Cynoglossus semilaevis.xlsx by Weiwei Zheng (140828)

“…</p>Results<p>Obvious histopathological differences were observed between the resistant and susceptible groups in terms of inflammatory cells infiltration, and tissue dissociation of mucosal layer. 16S rRNA sequencing analysis indicated that Vibrio increased but Stenotrophomonas, Chryseobacterium, Delftia, and Salinivibrio decreased in the susceptible group. Compared to the control group, 1,986 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected in the susceptible group, significantly more than the 310 DEGs found in the resistant group. …”

Table 2_Qinggan Yipi capsule ameliorates hepatic fibrosis in rats by down-regulating the TGF-β1/Smad2/3 signaling pathway and improving gut microbiota imbalance.docx by Wenjing Xue (2880686)

“…Background and objective<p>Qinggan Yipi Capsule (QgYp) is a hospital preparation that has been used for many years in the treatment of chronic liver diseases. …”

Data Sheet 2_Qinggan Yipi capsule ameliorates hepatic fibrosis in rats by down-regulating the TGF-β1/Smad2/3 signaling pathway and improving gut microbiota imbalance.pdf by Wenjing Xue (2880686)

“…Background and objective<p>Qinggan Yipi Capsule (QgYp) is a hospital preparation that has been used for many years in the treatment of chronic liver diseases. …”

Table 3_Interactions between the intestinal microbiome and host genes in regulating vibriosis resistance in Cynoglossus semilaevis.xlsx by Weiwei Zheng (140828)

“…</p>Results<p>Obvious histopathological differences were observed between the resistant and susceptible groups in terms of inflammatory cells infiltration, and tissue dissociation of mucosal layer. 16S rRNA sequencing analysis indicated that Vibrio increased but Stenotrophomonas, Chryseobacterium, Delftia, and Salinivibrio decreased in the susceptible group. Compared to the control group, 1,986 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected in the susceptible group, significantly more than the 310 DEGs found in the resistant group. …”

Image 3_Cellular interactions and Ion channel signatures in atrial fibrillation remodeling: insights from single-cell analysis and machine learning.tif by Bin He (75597)

“…In the AF group, the proportions of EF, APF, and LBCs were increased, whereas the proportion of EC was decreased; by contrast, the SR group displayed a higher proportion of EC. …”

Table 3_Cellular interactions and Ion channel signatures in atrial fibrillation remodeling: insights from single-cell analysis and machine learning.xlsx by Bin He (75597)

“…In the AF group, the proportions of EF, APF, and LBCs were increased, whereas the proportion of EC was decreased; by contrast, the SR group displayed a higher proportion of EC. …”

Table 8_Cellular interactions and Ion channel signatures in atrial fibrillation remodeling: insights from single-cell analysis and machine learning.xlsx by Bin He (75597)

“…In the AF group, the proportions of EF, APF, and LBCs were increased, whereas the proportion of EC was decreased; by contrast, the SR group displayed a higher proportion of EC. …”

Table 2_Cellular interactions and Ion channel signatures in atrial fibrillation remodeling: insights from single-cell analysis and machine learning.xlsx by Bin He (75597)

“…In the AF group, the proportions of EF, APF, and LBCs were increased, whereas the proportion of EC was decreased; by contrast, the SR group displayed a higher proportion of EC. …”

Table 1_Cellular interactions and Ion channel signatures in atrial fibrillation remodeling: insights from single-cell analysis and machine learning.xlsx by Bin He (75597)

“…In the AF group, the proportions of EF, APF, and LBCs were increased, whereas the proportion of EC was decreased; by contrast, the SR group displayed a higher proportion of EC. …”

Image 2_Cellular interactions and Ion channel signatures in atrial fibrillation remodeling: insights from single-cell analysis and machine learning.tif by Bin He (75597)

“…In the AF group, the proportions of EF, APF, and LBCs were increased, whereas the proportion of EC was decreased; by contrast, the SR group displayed a higher proportion of EC. …”

Table 6_Cellular interactions and Ion channel signatures in atrial fibrillation remodeling: insights from single-cell analysis and machine learning.xlsx by Bin He (75597)

“…In the AF group, the proportions of EF, APF, and LBCs were increased, whereas the proportion of EC was decreased; by contrast, the SR group displayed a higher proportion of EC. …”

Table 5_Cellular interactions and Ion channel signatures in atrial fibrillation remodeling: insights from single-cell analysis and machine learning.xlsx by Bin He (75597)

“…In the AF group, the proportions of EF, APF, and LBCs were increased, whereas the proportion of EC was decreased; by contrast, the SR group displayed a higher proportion of EC. …”

Image 5_Cellular interactions and Ion channel signatures in atrial fibrillation remodeling: insights from single-cell analysis and machine learning.tif by Bin He (75597)

“…In the AF group, the proportions of EF, APF, and LBCs were increased, whereas the proportion of EC was decreased; by contrast, the SR group displayed a higher proportion of EC. …”

Image 1_Cellular interactions and Ion channel signatures in atrial fibrillation remodeling: insights from single-cell analysis and machine learning.tiff by Bin He (75597)

“…In the AF group, the proportions of EF, APF, and LBCs were increased, whereas the proportion of EC was decreased; by contrast, the SR group displayed a higher proportion of EC. …”