Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
621
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…We further find that the Weber number (<i>We</i>) significantly influences the Leidenfrost point, with the droplet impact wall behavior going through the states of film bounce back, ejecting tiny droplets and bounce back, and ultimately droplet breakup as the <i>We</i> increases. …”
-
622
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…We further find that the Weber number (<i>We</i>) significantly influences the Leidenfrost point, with the droplet impact wall behavior going through the states of film bounce back, ejecting tiny droplets and bounce back, and ultimately droplet breakup as the <i>We</i> increases. …”
-
623
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…We further find that the Weber number (<i>We</i>) significantly influences the Leidenfrost point, with the droplet impact wall behavior going through the states of film bounce back, ejecting tiny droplets and bounce back, and ultimately droplet breakup as the <i>We</i> increases. …”
-
624
Differences in mean scores of upper extremity performance in all five accelerometer-derived variables across four time points- pre-HABIT, post-HABIT, 3-month, and 6-month post-HABI...
Published 2024“…The trends seen in the line graphs above indicate a decrease in all the accelerometer derived variables at 3-month time point (except use ratio) suggesting decrease in bimanual performance. …”
-
625
-
626
-
627
-
628
-
629
-
630
-
631
-
632
-
633
Accuracy test results.
Published 2025“…The runtime memory usage on the CIFAR-100 dataset is only 44.52%, a decrease of 44.56% compared to the baseline model. …”
-
634
Experiment environment and parameter.
Published 2025“…The runtime memory usage on the CIFAR-100 dataset is only 44.52%, a decrease of 44.56% compared to the baseline model. …”
-
635
Test results for NME and FR.
Published 2025“…The runtime memory usage on the CIFAR-100 dataset is only 44.52%, a decrease of 44.56% compared to the baseline model. …”
-
636
DARTS algorithm process.
Published 2025“…The runtime memory usage on the CIFAR-100 dataset is only 44.52%, a decrease of 44.56% compared to the baseline model. …”
-
637
Comparison result of memory usage.
Published 2025“…The runtime memory usage on the CIFAR-100 dataset is only 44.52%, a decrease of 44.56% compared to the baseline model. …”
-
638
LKA model structure.
Published 2025“…The runtime memory usage on the CIFAR-100 dataset is only 44.52%, a decrease of 44.56% compared to the baseline model. …”
-
639
Test results on different datasets.
Published 2025“…The runtime memory usage on the CIFAR-100 dataset is only 44.52%, a decrease of 44.56% compared to the baseline model. …”
-
640
Comparison result of memory usage.
Published 2025“…The runtime memory usage on the CIFAR-100 dataset is only 44.52%, a decrease of 44.56% compared to the baseline model. …”