Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
point increase » unit increase (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
point increase » unit increase (Expand Search)
-
701
Top view of the experimental setup.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
702
Amplitude for A/L = 0.338.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
703
Parameters of energy harvesting.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
704
Graph for Max Amplitude/Length at G<sub>y</sub> = 0.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
705
Amplitude for A/L = 0.02.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
706
Graph for maximum Frequency at G<sub>y</sub> = 0.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
707
Graph for maximum Power at G<sub>y</sub> = 0.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
708
Amplitude for A/L = 0.03.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
709
Summary of experimentation results.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
710
Piezoelectric eel.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
711
-
712
-
713
-
714
-
715
-
716
-
717
-
718
Association between FF Proximity and BMI by sex.
Published 2025“…An exponential decrease in FF proximity was associated with 0.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (p < 0.001) increase in BMI among males and 0.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (p < 0.05) decrease among females. …”
-
719
-
720