Diagram of study population. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

Subjects:

Microscopic examination of fetal placenta exposed to <i>U.simensis</i> essential oil: D-decidua, DA-decidual artery, DV-decidual vein, blue arrow head-maternal blood space, CBV-cho... by Bickes Wube (21678222)

Subjects:

The raw data for Fig 8A. by Hongjoo An (21703199)

Subjects:

Establishment of a diabetic rat model. by Lan Zeng (638254)

Subjects:

Cinnamaldehyde is a specific ligand for HL-IR. by Ceyan Kuang (8554557)

Subjects:

Stereological estimations of morpho-quantitative parameters in marmoset dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (DLG). by Nelyane N. M. Santana (5217074)

Length distribution and condition factors <i>K</i> of <i>E. erythropterus</i> (A) before and (B) after the NRE opening. by Jeong-Soo Gim (18058588)

Subjects:

Distribution of zooplankton abundance by depth (A) before and (B) after and phytoplankton abundance by depth (C) before and (D) after the opening of the NRE. by Jeong-Soo Gim (18058588)

Subjects:

MRI grading systems’ diagnostic accuracy for MD. by Neda Azarpey (20308334)

“…Adjusting the threshold to EH grade 2 results in a sensitivity increase to 92.1% (CI: 85.9–95.7) and a specificity decrease to 70.6% (CI: 64.5–76.1), with a DOR of 28.056 (CI: 14.917–52.770). …”

MRI-based cochlear hydrops grading and PLE in MD. by Neda Azarpey (20308334)

“…Adjusting the threshold to EH grade 2 results in a sensitivity increase to 92.1% (CI: 85.9–95.7) and a specificity decrease to 70.6% (CI: 64.5–76.1), with a DOR of 28.056 (CI: 14.917–52.770). …”

Cochlear hydrops classification in MRI systems. by Neda Azarpey (20308334)

“…Adjusting the threshold to EH grade 2 results in a sensitivity increase to 92.1% (CI: 85.9–95.7) and a specificity decrease to 70.6% (CI: 64.5–76.1), with a DOR of 28.056 (CI: 14.917–52.770). …”

Source data - by Desheng Xie (21439869)

Subjects:

Comparison with Existing Studies. by Na Zhao (112953)

“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”

Specimen Preparation and Experimental Setup. by Na Zhao (112953)

“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”

UCS texts data. by Na Zhao (112953)

“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”

Geometric manifold comparison visualization by Eloy Geenjaar (21533195)

Subjects:

Hyperparameter ranges by Eloy Geenjaar (21533195)

Subjects:

Convolutional vs RNN context encoder by Eloy Geenjaar (21533195)

Subjects:

Flow chart of participants selection. by Linjia Duan (13276989)

Subjects:

Characteristics of the included studies. by Xin Liu (43569)

Subjects: