بدائل البحث:
significant decrease » significant increase (توسيع البحث), significantly increased (توسيع البحث)
worse decrease » we decrease (توسيع البحث)
_ increasing » _ increased (توسيع البحث)
significant decrease » significant increase (توسيع البحث), significantly increased (توسيع البحث)
worse decrease » we decrease (توسيع البحث)
_ increasing » _ increased (توسيع البحث)
-
1
Data cleaning and preparation algorithm.
منشور في 2025"…<div><p>Background</p><p>Liver cancer is the third-deadliest cancer globally, significantly affecting the Asian population, which accounts for 70% of cases. …"
-
2
The RehaGait® system.
منشور في 2025"…Step height was normalized postoperatively; all other variables remained significantly worse than the HI. There were strong correlations between stride length, velocity, heel strike angle, and toe-off angle and the functional gait tests, but no correlations for any variable and the balance domain score.…"
-
3
Flow chart of included patients and dropouts.
منشور في 2025"…Step height was normalized postoperatively; all other variables remained significantly worse than the HI. There were strong correlations between stride length, velocity, heel strike angle, and toe-off angle and the functional gait tests, but no correlations for any variable and the balance domain score.…"
-
4
Dataset of the analyzed data.
منشور في 2025"…Step height was normalized postoperatively; all other variables remained significantly worse than the HI. There were strong correlations between stride length, velocity, heel strike angle, and toe-off angle and the functional gait tests, but no correlations for any variable and the balance domain score.…"
-
5
Image1_The immunological and prognostic significance of the diabetes mellitus-related gene WFS1 in endometrial cancer.tif
منشور في 2024"…Stemness index analysis revealed that decreased WFS1 expression was associated with increased tumor grade and enhanced tumor stemness, suggesting increased malignancy of EC. …"
-
6
Table2_The immunological and prognostic significance of the diabetes mellitus-related gene WFS1 in endometrial cancer.xlsx
منشور في 2024"…Stemness index analysis revealed that decreased WFS1 expression was associated with increased tumor grade and enhanced tumor stemness, suggesting increased malignancy of EC. …"
-
7
Table3_The immunological and prognostic significance of the diabetes mellitus-related gene WFS1 in endometrial cancer.docx
منشور في 2024"…Stemness index analysis revealed that decreased WFS1 expression was associated with increased tumor grade and enhanced tumor stemness, suggesting increased malignancy of EC. …"
-
8
Table1_The immunological and prognostic significance of the diabetes mellitus-related gene WFS1 in endometrial cancer.xlsx
منشور في 2024"…Stemness index analysis revealed that decreased WFS1 expression was associated with increased tumor grade and enhanced tumor stemness, suggesting increased malignancy of EC. …"
-
9
-
10
Enterocolitis severity increases with DSS concentration.
منشور في 2025"…<p>Increased DSS concentration led to increased external bowel score, disruption of intestinal morphology, and decreased Ki-67 + cells. …"
-
11
-
12
CONSORT diagram.
منشور في 2024"…</p><p>Results</p><p>The study sample (N = 27) was mainly composed of females (74%) and the mean age was 74.26 years. 21 participants completed the intervention (22% drop-out rate). Statistically significant (<i>p</i><0.01) decreases in emotional loneliness and depressive symptoms were observed following the intervention. …"
-
13
Model-derived results show increased social following in individuals with disrupted utility-based risky decision-making.
منشور في 2024"…<b>(d)</b> We tested a link between decreased utility-based risk processing (measured by negative log likelihood in Solo trials; −LL) and increased ω<sub>follow</sub>. …"
-
14
-
15
Table 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.docx
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
16
Table 1_Effect of heat-killed Lacticaseibacillus paracasei KW3110 on mild to moderate seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms in Japanese adults: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-co...
منشور في 2025"…Diagnosis by an otorhinolaryngologist showed a significant decrease in the score of “paroxysmal sneezing or rhinorrhea” (p < 0.05) and “classification of severity of allergic rhinitis symptoms” (p < 0.05) at 4 weeks, and the number of subjects scoring “worse” (p < 0.05) in the efficacy assessment.…"
-
17
Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
18
Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
19
Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
20
Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"