Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
worse decrease » we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
worse decrease » we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
81
Table 3_Lyg1 deficiency aggravated LPS-induced chronic epididymal inflammation and sperm dysfunction in mouse.docx
Published 2025“…IVF showed a more significant decrease in fertilization rate in KO mice.…”
-
82
Image 3_Lyg1 deficiency aggravated LPS-induced chronic epididymal inflammation and sperm dysfunction in mouse.jpeg
Published 2025“…IVF showed a more significant decrease in fertilization rate in KO mice.…”
-
83
Merge dataset.
Published 2024“…Domestic and familial factors did not have a significant impact on young people’s mental health.…”
-
84
Mean GHQ scores (2019- September 2021).
Published 2024“…Domestic and familial factors did not have a significant impact on young people’s mental health.…”
-
85
Supplementary file 1_The interaction between obesity and sex alters the response to house dust mite in an experimental model of allergic lung inflammation.docx
Published 2025“…Introduction<p>Previous reports have shown that the prevalence of asthma among women is modified by puberty, implying a role for sex hormones in this difference. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that obesity is a significant predisposing factor for asthma, particularly among women. …”
-
86
Data Sheet 2_Phase 2 trial (NCI-COTC030) of adjuvant inhaled recombinant human IL-15 combined with amputation and adjuvant chemotherapy in dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma.pdf
Published 2025“…Cytotoxicity assays of PBMCs showed significant decreases after both surgery and chemotherapy with an overall decrease from the start to end of therapy (-18.2 ± 16.1%, P<0.001). …”
-
87
Data Sheet 1_Phase 2 trial (NCI-COTC030) of adjuvant inhaled recombinant human IL-15 combined with amputation and adjuvant chemotherapy in dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma.pdf
Published 2025“…Cytotoxicity assays of PBMCs showed significant decreases after both surgery and chemotherapy with an overall decrease from the start to end of therapy (-18.2 ± 16.1%, P<0.001). …”
-
88
Table 1_Microbial diversity and composition in the gut microbiome of patients during systemic inflammatory response syndrome: can we use gut bacteria as potential biomarkers to cha...
Published 2025“…Early AT taxonomic profiling showed a decrease in Anaerobutyricum spp. and an increase in Holdemania spp. in the sepsis group. …”
-
89
Table 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.docx
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
90
Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
91
Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
92
Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
93
Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
94
Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
95
Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
96
Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
97
Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
98
Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
99
Image 3_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
100
Table 1_Associations between the Dietary Inflammatory Index and depression among pregnant and postpartum women: analysis of NHANES 2005–2018.docx
Published 2025“…Diets with very high proinflammatory potential were linked to significantly increased odds of perinatal depression, whereas more anti-inflammatory diets did not result in a further decrease in depression risk below that threshold. …”