Changes in <i>SLC2A2</i> gene expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on its stage and correlation with oncofetal and stemness genes. by Yejin Kim (740789)

Subjects:

<i>SLC2A2</i> is essential for liver differentiation in developing vertebrates by Yejin Kim (740789)

Subjects:

Primers used for qPCR gene expression analysis. by Yejin Kim (740789)

Subjects:

The IGF1R pathway is upregulated following <i>slc2a2</i> knockdown in HepG2 cells and zebrafish embryos. by Yejin Kim (740789)

Subjects:

Gene expression dynamics during liver development. by Yejin Kim (740789)

Subjects:

Protein levels of GLUT2 were analyzed by western blotting. by Yejin Kim (740789)

Subjects:

Initial participants by wave*. by Yeo Ju Sohn (18536198)

“…<div><p>Background</p><p>Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a significant public health concern, particularly in the elderly population. …”

General characteristics of research participants. by Yeo Ju Sohn (18536198)

“…<div><p>Background</p><p>Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a significant public health concern, particularly in the elderly population. …”

Subcellular Mechanical Imaging of Erythrocytes with Optically Correlated Scanning Ion Conductance Microscopy by Yunong Wang (10358970)

“…Comparison of normal and diamide-treated red blood cells shows a significant increase in cell stiffness and a concomitant decrease in deformability, clearly demonstrating the quantitative abilities of the correlative approach taken here for stiffness measurements of intact cellular samples.…”

Group control-after intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”

Group SFA-before intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”

Lost cases. by Nan Tang (642590)

“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”

Group control-before intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”

Patient satisfaction with SFA intervention(%). by Nan Tang (642590)

“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”

Pre-Experiment. by Nan Tang (642590)

“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”

Group SFA-after intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”

Flowchart of literature screening process. by Shangtian Wang (20933822)

“…Subgroup analyses revealed a significant prevention of serious infections (OR = 0.40, 95%CI 0.25-0.64, p = 0.0001). …”

Basic characteristics of included literature. by Shangtian Wang (20933822)

“…Subgroup analyses revealed a significant prevention of serious infections (OR = 0.40, 95%CI 0.25-0.64, p = 0.0001). …”

Raw data. by Shangtian Wang (20933822)

“…Subgroup analyses revealed a significant prevention of serious infections (OR = 0.40, 95%CI 0.25-0.64, p = 0.0001). …”

Forest plot of overall analysis results. by Shangtian Wang (20933822)

“…Subgroup analyses revealed a significant prevention of serious infections (OR = 0.40, 95%CI 0.25-0.64, p = 0.0001). …”