Search alternatives:
significantly affected » significantly associated (Expand Search), significantly reduced (Expand Search), significant effect (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
affected decrease » affected areas (Expand Search), effects decreased (Expand Search)
significantly affected » significantly associated (Expand Search), significantly reduced (Expand Search), significant effect (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
affected decrease » affected areas (Expand Search), effects decreased (Expand Search)
-
881
-
882
-
883
-
884
The RehaGait® system.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>The patients walked with reduced hip flexion, heel strike angle and toe-off angle, and had shorter strides, decreased velocity, and increased time for swing and single support, compared to HI. …”
-
885
Flow chart of included patients and dropouts.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>The patients walked with reduced hip flexion, heel strike angle and toe-off angle, and had shorter strides, decreased velocity, and increased time for swing and single support, compared to HI. …”
-
886
Dataset of the analyzed data.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>The patients walked with reduced hip flexion, heel strike angle and toe-off angle, and had shorter strides, decreased velocity, and increased time for swing and single support, compared to HI. …”
-
887
-
888
-
889
-
890
-
891
-
892
-
893
-
894
-
895
Summary of significance levels for comparison of surgical segment ROM between different test groups.
Published 2025Subjects: -
896
Analysis of the Nugent score before (T=0) and after (T=1) the use of the vaginal gel. Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).
Published 2025“…Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).…”
-
897
-
898
-
899
-
900